Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Ligue 1 center back sitting at 48.37 on the FQ scale — squarely in fringe/typical territory, below the 50th percentile baseline for the position. Across 31 matches (2,790 minutes), the most notable on-ball output is a modest 0.23 key passes per 90 and 0.06 assists per 90, with a match rating of 6.81 — none of which stand out for the role. The specialist panel is contested (consensus confidence 0.56), reflecting genuine disagreement about how to read a profile where all sub-scores are null.
The FQ score of 48.37 is driven primarily by below-baseline overall output with no sub-score dimension clearing the threshold to offset it — all six sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense, possession control, physical duel) returned null, meaning no single area of elite or above-average contribution could be identified to pull the score upward.
Form score of 51.89 sits 3.52 points above the FQ score of 48.37 — within the ±5 stable band, though nudging toward a mild upward signal. This does not constitute a meaningful trend shift; the player remains in typical-performer territory on both measures.
Nearly identical FQ score (48.49 vs 48.37), suggesting a comparable overall output level for the center back role; specific stylistic differences cannot be determined from available data.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Closest ceiling in this peer group at 49.62 FQ, marginally above this player's score, indicating a similar positional tier with a slight edge in overall measured contribution.
FQ of 47.13 places him just below this player, making him the lower bound of the comparable range — useful as a floor reference for this performance band.
All role-critical sub-scores — defense, physical duel, and progression — are null despite 91% data completeness and 0.93 confidence. For a center back, the absence of granular defensive action data (duels won, interceptions, clearances) means the 1.39 tackles per 90 is the only defensive signal available, and it cannot be benchmarked against positional norms without sub-score context.
0.23 key passes per 90 and 0.06 assists per 90 are low figures for a modern center back expected to contribute to build-up play. No progression sub-score is available to confirm or challenge this reading, but the raw per-90 numbers do not suggest a ball-playing profile.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →