TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Marcus Thuram

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Inter
Position
Centre Forward
Also: Striker
Date of Birth
Aug 6, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#9
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Marcus Thuram
Marcus Thuram
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Inter
Position
Centre Forward
Also: Striker
Date of Birth
Aug 6, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#9
TactiQ Score
77.7
89% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
77.7
Form Score
74.9
Confidence
89%
Role
striker
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.61
Assists
0.28
Key Pass
1.36
Tackles
1.13
Rating
7.21
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 9, 2026

A mid-tier Serie A striker sitting at a TQ Score of 69.5 — adequate starter territory, consistently above baseline but not yet threatening the 70-77 "good" band. The most distinctive data point is the per-90 profile: 0.60 goals, 0.25 assists, and 1.35 key passes per 90 across 1,801 minutes, suggesting a striker who contributes beyond pure finishing. With all dimensional sub-scores absent, the full picture of where this output comes from remains incomplete.

Why this score

The TQ Score of 69.5 is driven by consistent aggregate production across 27 matches rather than any standout dimensional strength — all sub-scores are null, so no single facet can be credited or blamed. The 7.21 average match rating and 1.15 tackles per 90 indicate a well-rounded but not elite output profile for the role.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 69.64 sits just +0.14 above the TQ Score of 69.5 — well within the ±5 stable band. No upward or downward trend is detectable; production is flat and consistent across the current season.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Amine Gouiri

Gouiri's TQ Score of 67.41 places him in the same adequate-starter band, reflecting a similar level of consistent but non-elite striker output; the key difference is that this player's higher per-90 involvement (1.35 key passes) suggests a broader creative role than Gouiri typically occupies.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
29
Minutes
1914
Goals
13
Assists
6
Key passes
29
Rating
7.21
Tackles
24
Shots on target
29
Successful dribbles
17
Clean sheets
15
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 73.5Form 73.8
Previous
TQ 74.3Form 74.9
Current
TQ 73.3Form 74.9
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.61
Assists
0.28
Key Passes
1.36
Tackles
1.13
Rating
7.21
Serge Gnabry

Gnabry's 67.34 TQ Score reflects comparable aggregate production in this scoring window, though Gnabry's natural position as a wide attacker means his output profile is built differently — this player's role is more centrally defined as a striker.

Compare →
Iago Aspas Juncal

Aspas Juncal's 66.39 TQ Score is the closest floor comparison, with both players operating in a similar production tier; Aspas Juncal's historically higher creative involvement distinguishes him from this player's more straightforward striker profile.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
1914 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Strong current rating
Live rating sits at 7.21 in the current season snapshot.
Direct output
19 combined goals and assists are showing in live coverage.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Dimensional transparency

All six sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense, possession control, physical duel) are null. For a striker, the absence of a finishing sub-score is the most consequential gap — conversion efficiency and xG performance cannot be evaluated, making it impossible to determine whether the 0.60 goals per 90 reflects clinical finishing or high-volume shooting.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →