TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Iago Aspas

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Celta de Vigo
Position
Centre Forward
Also: Striker
Date of Birth
Aug 1, 1987 (38)
Jersey Number
#10
League
La Liga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Iago Aspas
Iago Aspas
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Celta de Vigo
Position
Centre Forward
Also: Striker
Date of Birth
Aug 1, 1987 (38)
Jersey Number
#10
TactiQ Score
70.6
80% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
70.6
Form Score
66.5
Confidence
80%
Role
striker
League
La Liga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.45
Assists
0.27
Key Pass
2.62
Tackles
1.17
Rating
6.99
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A La Liga striker sitting at 66.39 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, with clear gaps in dimensional depth. The most distinctive data point is a high key pass rate of 2.86 per 90, which is above typical for a pure striker role, suggesting involvement in build-up beyond just finishing. Goal output of 0.39 per 90 across 913 minutes (27 matches) reflects a contributor rather than a primary scorer.

Why this score

With all sub-scores null, the FQ score of 66.39 is driven entirely by aggregate output metrics — 0.39 goals per 90, 0.30 assists per 90, and a 7.0 average rating — rather than any elite dimensional strength. The absence of finishing, creation, and progression breakdowns caps the ceiling of this assessment and prevents identification of a standout quality.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 63.46 sits 2.93 points below the FQ score of 66.39 — within the ±5 stable range, but trending slightly downward. This is not an alarm signal, but it indicates the player is not currently outperforming their season baseline.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Robert Lewandowski

Comparable FQ scores (66.57 vs 66.39) place both players in the same adequate-starter band this season, though Lewandowski's historical profile and role centrality make the similarity a reflection of current-season output rather than overall calibre.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
29
Minutes
998
Goals
5
Assists
3
Key passes
29
Rating
6.99
Tackles
13
Shots on target
12
Successful dribbles
11
Clean sheets
8
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 71.7Form 71.0
Previous
TQ 70.8Form 71.0
Current
TQ 66.6Form 66.5
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.45
Assists
0.27
Key Passes
2.62
Tackles
1.17
Rating
6.99
Antoine Griezmann

Near-identical FQ scores (66.16 vs 66.39) suggest similar aggregate contribution levels in La Liga; Griezmann's role typically involves more creation volume, which may explain different underlying dimensional profiles despite the matching headline score.

Compare →
Gerard Moreno Balaguero

The closest FQ match at 66.91, operating in the same league and role bucket; the marginal gap suggests very similar overall output, though role context and minutes distribution may differ.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive outcomes
8 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Goal output

0.39 goals per 90 over 913 minutes is below what a primary striker in La Liga typically needs to drive a high FQ score. Across 27 matches, this volume places the player in a supporting rather than focal attacking role.

Scoring model depth

All sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) are null, meaning no dimensional strength can be confirmed. This limits role-specific evaluation and prevents identifying where the player is genuinely above or below baseline.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →