TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Gerard Moreno

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Villarreal
Position
Centre Forward
Also: Striker
Date of Birth
Apr 7, 1992 (34)
Jersey Number
#7
League
La Liga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Gerard Moreno
Gerard Moreno
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Villarreal
Position
Centre Forward
Also: Striker
Date of Birth
Apr 7, 1992 (34)
Jersey Number
#7
TactiQ Score
74.2
72% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
74.2
Form Score
71.5
Confidence
72%
Role
striker
League
La Liga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.67
Assists
—
Key Pass
1.63
Tackles
1.11
Rating
7.13
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 9, 2026

A La Liga striker sitting at 66.91 on the TQ scale — adequate starter territory, but not a clear standout. Across 18 matches (1,129 minutes), the most distinctive visible metric is 0.72 goals per 90, which sits above typical for a starter at this level. All dimensional sub-scores are absent, meaning the composite score is the primary signal and deeper quality assessment is limited.

Why this score

The 66.91 TQ Score reflects competent but not above-average striker output, landing in the "adequate starter" band (60–69). With all sub-scores null, the score is driven entirely by the composite FQ signal and the per-90 production data — no finishing, creation, or progression dimensions could be weighted individually.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 65.38 sits 1.53 points below the TQ Score of 66.91 — within the ±5 stable range, indicating no meaningful directional shift. This is a stable, near-baseline performer with no upward momentum currently visible.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Serge Gnabry

Gnabry's TQ score of 67.34 is nearly identical, placing both players in the same adequate-starter band; Gnabry's broader positional versatility across the front line distinguishes him from a more fixed striker profile.

Compare →
Amine Gouiri
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
20
Minutes
1232
Goals
9
Key passes
22
Rating
7.11
Tackles
15
Shots on target
15
Successful dribbles
14
Clean sheets
4
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 72.9Form 72.8
Previous
TQ 67.4Form 67.0
Current
TQ 71.0Form 71.5
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.67
Assists
—
Key Passes
1.63
Tackles
1.11
Rating
7.13

Gouiri scores 67.41 — the closest numerical match in this peer group — and shares a similar mid-tier production ceiling; Gouiri tends to contribute more in progressive carrying contexts, a dimension that cannot be confirmed or denied here due to null sub-scores.

Compare →
Iago Aspas Juncal

Aspas Juncal at 66.39 is the lowest of the three comparables and the nearest La Liga contextual peer; his profile skews toward creative involvement from a deeper striker position, which may differ from the more direct goal-output profile suggested by this player's 0.72 goals per 90.

Compare →
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Dimensional transparency

All role-critical sub-scores — finishing, creation, progression, and defensive contribution — are null. For a striker, the absence of a finishing sub-score is the most significant gap: conversion efficiency and xG relationship cannot be assessed, meaning the 0.72 goals per 90 figure cannot be contextualised against shot quality or volume.

Creation output

With 1.59 key passes per 90, there is some involvement in chance creation, but no creation sub-score exists to benchmark this against role expectations. Assists data is also absent, so the end-product value of that passing activity is unknown.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →