TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Ruben Aguilar

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Lens
Position
Right Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Apr 26, 1993 (33)
Jersey Number
#2
League
Ligue 1
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Ruben Aguilar
Ruben Aguilar
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Lens
Position
Right Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Apr 26, 1993 (33)
Jersey Number
#2
TactiQ Score
64.6
82% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
64.6
Form Score
63.8
Confidence
82%
Role
fullback_wingback
League
Ligue 1
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.11
Assists
0.11
Key Pass
1.29
Tackles
2.03
Rating
6.96
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Ligue 1 fullback/wingback sitting at 49.3 on the FQ scale — squarely in the fringe-to-typical range — across 22 appearances and 1,565 minutes this season. The most notable data point is 1.32 key passes per 90, which sits above what many defensive-minded fullbacks produce, but this is not enough to offset below-baseline overall output. All sub-dimension scores are null, meaning no single area of the game stands out as a clear strength.

Why this score

The FQ score of 49.3 reflects aggregate below-baseline production for the fullback/wingback role, with no sub-score exceeding the 70 threshold required to identify a standout dimension. The absence of granular sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense all null) means the overall signal is driven by the composite per-90 profile — 2.07 tackles, 1.32 key passes, and 0.12 goals and assists each — none of which individually elevates the player above typical for this role.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 47.63 sits 1.7 points below the FQ score of 49.3 — within the ±5 stable band — indicating neither a meaningful decline nor any upward momentum. Performance has been consistent at a below-baseline level throughout the season.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Johan Andrés Mojica Palacio

Nearly identical FQ score (48.63 vs 49.3) places them in the same typical-performer tier for the fullback/wingback role; direct stylistic comparison is limited by the absence of sub-score breakdowns for either player.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
24
Minutes
1600
Goals
2
Assists
2
Key passes
23
Rating
6.96
Tackles
36
Shots on target
3
Successful dribbles
7
Clean sheets
8
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 66.9Form 66.5
Previous
TQ 64.5Form 64.3
Current
TQ 64.0Form 63.8
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.11
Assists
0.11
Key Passes
1.29
Tackles
2.03
Rating
6.96
Nordi Mukiele Mulere

FQ score of 48.61 mirrors the same below-baseline aggregate output for the role; Mukiele has historically shown more positional versatility, which may account for marginal scoring differences.

Compare →
Gabriel Gudmundsson

Gudmundsson's FQ of 50.5 is the closest ceiling in this comparable set, sitting just above the typical-performer threshold; the 1.2-point gap suggests marginally more consistent output, though both players occupy the same broad performance band.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
36 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
8 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

2.07 tackles per 90 is a measurable defensive contribution, but for a fullback/wingback in Ligue 1, this figure alone does not indicate above-baseline defensive reliability — particularly with all defensive sub-scores null and an FQ of 49.3 suggesting no dimensional strength.

Attacking involvement

0.12 goals and 0.12 assists per 90 represent minimal direct attacking output for a wingback role, where higher attacking returns are typically expected. 1.32 key passes per 90 provides some creative involvement but has not translated into end-product efficiency.

Overall rating

A match rating of 6.98 per 90 sits at the lower end of the adequate range, consistent with the FQ score of 49.3 and indicating no sustained periods of high-impact performance across the 22-match sample.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →