Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Ligue 1 fullback/wingback sitting at 49.3 on the FQ scale — squarely in the fringe-to-typical range — across 22 appearances and 1,565 minutes this season. The most notable data point is 1.32 key passes per 90, which sits above what many defensive-minded fullbacks produce, but this is not enough to offset below-baseline overall output. All sub-dimension scores are null, meaning no single area of the game stands out as a clear strength.
The FQ score of 49.3 reflects aggregate below-baseline production for the fullback/wingback role, with no sub-score exceeding the 70 threshold required to identify a standout dimension. The absence of granular sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense all null) means the overall signal is driven by the composite per-90 profile — 2.07 tackles, 1.32 key passes, and 0.12 goals and assists each — none of which individually elevates the player above typical for this role.
Form score of 47.63 sits 1.7 points below the FQ score of 49.3 — within the ±5 stable band — indicating neither a meaningful decline nor any upward momentum. Performance has been consistent at a below-baseline level throughout the season.
Nearly identical FQ score (48.63 vs 49.3) places them in the same typical-performer tier for the fullback/wingback role; direct stylistic comparison is limited by the absence of sub-score breakdowns for either player.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
FQ score of 48.61 mirrors the same below-baseline aggregate output for the role; Mukiele has historically shown more positional versatility, which may account for marginal scoring differences.
Gudmundsson's FQ of 50.5 is the closest ceiling in this comparable set, sitting just above the typical-performer threshold; the 1.2-point gap suggests marginally more consistent output, though both players occupy the same broad performance band.
2.07 tackles per 90 is a measurable defensive contribution, but for a fullback/wingback in Ligue 1, this figure alone does not indicate above-baseline defensive reliability — particularly with all defensive sub-scores null and an FQ of 49.3 suggesting no dimensional strength.
0.12 goals and 0.12 assists per 90 represent minimal direct attacking output for a wingback role, where higher attacking returns are typically expected. 1.32 key passes per 90 provides some creative involvement but has not translated into end-product efficiency.
A match rating of 6.98 per 90 sits at the lower end of the adequate range, consistent with the FQ score of 49.3 and indicating no sustained periods of high-impact performance across the 22-match sample.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →