TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Nordi Mukiele

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Sunderland
Position
Right Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Nov 1, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#20
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Nordi Mukiele
Nordi Mukiele
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Sunderland
Position
Right Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Nov 1, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#20
TactiQ Score
69.5
96% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
69.5
Form Score
68.3
Confidence
96%
Role
fullback_wingback
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.10
Assists
0.14
Key Pass
0.76
Tackles
2.31
Rating
6.99
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A fringe-level Premier League fullback/wingback sitting at 48.61 on the FQ scale — below the 50-59 typical performer band and below baseline for the role. Across 28 matches (2,427 minutes), the most notable output is 2.34 tackles per 90, while attacking contributions remain thin at 0.07 goals and 0.15 assists per 90. High data confidence (0.90) confirms this reading is reliable, not a sample-size artefact.

Why this score

The FQ score of 48.61 reflects below-baseline production across fullback/wingback responsibilities with no sub-score dimension breaking above the threshold for above-average contribution. The absence of a standout area — defensively or offensively — means the player offers no compensating elite trait to offset the overall shortfall.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 52.06 sits 3.45 points above the FQ score of 48.61 — within the ±5 stable range, though nudging toward a modest upward signal. This is not a meaningful trend shift, but recent matches are tracking slightly closer to baseline than the season aggregate.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Johan Andrés Mojica Palacio

Nearly identical FQ score (48.63 vs 48.61) places them at the same below-baseline tier for fullbacks; Mojica Palacio's profile will differ in league context and specific role demands.

Compare →
Ali Abdi
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
30
Minutes
2607
Goals
3
Assists
4
Key passes
22
Rating
6.99
Tackles
67
Shots on target
4
Successful dribbles
12
Clean sheets
9
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 62.8Form 62.6
Previous
TQ 64.4Form 64.3
Current
TQ 68.7Form 68.3
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.10
Assists
0.14
Key Passes
0.76
Tackles
2.31
Rating
6.99

A close FQ match at 47.95, reflecting similarly limited overall contribution for a wide defensive role; the marginal gap suggests Abdi offers slightly less aggregate output.

Compare →
Gabriel Gudmundsson

Gudmundsson's FQ of 50.5 edges into the typical performer band that this player has not yet reached, making him a useful benchmark for what modest improvement in role output looks like at this level.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2607 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
67 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
9 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Attacking output

0.07 goals and 0.15 assists per 90 are low for a fullback/wingback role where progressive and creative contribution is a core expectation. 0.82 key passes per 90 suggests limited influence in the final third.

Overall role contribution

An FQ score of 48.61 places this player below the 50-59 typical performer band. With all dimensional sub-scores null, the aggregate signal points to no area of meaningful above-baseline output across the standard fullback metrics of defending, progression, and chance creation.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →