Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A goalkeeper sitting at 60.31 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, competent but without standout metrics to separate him from the positional pack. The most distinctive feature of this profile is not his baseline score but the 10.3-point gap between his current form score (70.57) and his season FQ score (60.31), signalling a meaningful upswing in recent performances. High data confidence (0.93) across 34 matches and 3,063 minutes means this read is reliable.
The FQ score of 60.31 reflects a goalkeeper who meets positional requirements without exceeding them — role-specific sub-scores (defense, shot-stopping) are not decomposed in this schema, which limits precision, but the overall scoring environment is well-measured and the result is consistent with a serviceable rather than standout profile.
Form score of 70.57 sits 10.3 points above the season FQ score of 60.31 — a meaningful upward trajectory, not noise, given the 0.93 confidence rating and full 34-match sample. This is the strongest signal in the profile: recent performances are running well above his established baseline.
Nearly identical FQ score (60.52 vs 60.31) places them in the same adequate-starter band; de Sá's profile offers a useful positional benchmark, though league context may differ.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Rønnow's FQ score of 60.77 is marginally higher, suggesting a comparable baseline level of goalkeeper output; the key differentiator to investigate would be distribution and sweeping metrics where Rønnow has more documented data.
Mvogo's 61.32 FQ score sits at the top of this comparable cluster; all three players occupy the 60–62 band, confirming this goalkeeper's positioning as a mid-tier starter rather than a rotation or elite option.
No granular save percentage, xG prevention, or clean sheet data is available in this profile. Without a defense sub-score, it is impossible to confirm whether the FQ score of 60.31 reflects adequate or below-average shot-stopping — a critical gap for evaluating a goalkeeper's core function.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →