Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Ligue 1 goalkeeper sitting at 61.32 on the FQ scale — squarely in the adequate-starter band, meaning clear gaps exist but positional requirements are broadly met. Across 28 matches (2,520 minutes) this season, there are no standout sub-scores to anchor a stronger rating in either direction. The 6.86 average match rating and 0.07 tackles per 90 reflect a goalkeeper who contributes without distinguishing themselves.
The FQ score of 61.32 is driven primarily by the absence of any elite signal: no goalkeeper-specific sub-scores (saves per 90, save percentage, xG prevented) are available to push the rating higher, and the general metrics show nothing above baseline. The score confidence of 0.87 over a solid 28-match sample means this mid-range reading is reliable, not a thin-data artefact.
Form score (58.59) is 2.73 points below the FQ score (61.32), placing this player in the stable-to-soft-decline band — the gap is below the 5-point threshold for a confirmed downward trend but is not neutral. No structural deterioration is signalled at this margin.
Rønnow's FQ score of 60.77 places him within 0.55 points of this player, reflecting a similarly adequate-starter profile; the key difference is Rønnow operates in a different league context, which may affect the difficulty weighting behind that score.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
De Sá's FQ score of 60.52 makes him the closest comparable by rating, suggesting a broadly equivalent performance tier; he differs in club profile and playing environment, which shapes the nature of the goalkeeping demands he faces.
Areola's FQ score of 62.77 is the ceiling of this comparison group — 1.45 points higher — and represents what a modest upward step from this player's current level looks like; Areola's higher-profile club context likely contributes to that marginal gap.
Goalkeeper-specific metrics — saves per 90, save percentage, xG prevented — are absent from the dataset. With 91% overall data completeness, this is a structural gap in goalkeeper evaluation rather than a data quality issue, and it prevents any meaningful assessment of the core skill for this role.
The form score of 58.59 sits 2.73 points below the season FQ score of 61.32, indicating performances over the most recent window are running slightly below the established baseline. While within normal variance, it represents a mild downward drift rather than stability.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →