Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Ligue 1 central midfielder sitting at 64.13 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, fulfilling baseline role requirements across 29 matches (2,482 minutes) this season. The most distinctive surface-level signal is a high key pass rate of 2.83 per 90, paired with 3.08 tackles per 90, suggesting a two-way contributor rather than a specialist. No single dimension stands out as elite, and the absence of granular sub-scores limits deeper profiling.
The FQ score of 64.13 reflects a player meeting — but not exceeding — the central midfielder baseline. With all role-specific sub-scores (creation, progression, defense, finishing) returning null, the composite is driven entirely by per-90 surface stats and the overall rating of 7.23, which is solid but not a differentiator at this level.
Form score of 65.7 sits just 1.6 points above the FQ score of 64.13 — within the ±5 stable band, indicating no meaningful upward or downward momentum. Performance is consistent and flat rather than trending in either direction.
Anderson's FQ score of 64.21 is nearly identical, placing both players in the same adequate-starter band for central midfield; Anderson profiles as a more progressive ball-carrier, whereas this player's tackle rate suggests a stronger defensive emphasis.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Amiri's 63.39 FQ score reflects a similar mid-tier central midfield output; Amiri tends to operate with a higher creative burden, while this player's 3.08 tackles per 90 points to a more balanced two-way role.
Modrić's current FQ score of 62.65 lands in the same range, reflecting age-related output decline from a historically elite baseline; unlike Modrić, this player has no established elite ceiling to contextualise the score against.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →