TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Nadiem Amiri

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
FSV Mainz 05
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Oct 27, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#10
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Nadiem Amiri
Nadiem Amiri
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
FSV Mainz 05
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Oct 27, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#10
TactiQ Score
76.2
85% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
76.2
Form Score
70.8
Confidence
85%
Role
central_midfielder
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.51
Assists
0.09
Key Pass
2.56
Tackles
1.35
Rating
7.38
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A Bundesliga central midfielder sitting at 63.39 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, but without standout production in any measurable dimension. The most distinctive feature of this profile is its uniformity: 0.54 goals per 90 and 2.43 key passes per 90 suggest a player contributing across multiple areas without excelling in any single one. Confidence in the score is solid at 0.80 across 23 matches and 1,850 minutes.

Why this score

With all role-specific sub-scores (creation, progression, defense, finishing) returning null, the FQ score of 63.39 is driven entirely by aggregate output metrics rather than dimensional quality. The per-90 numbers — particularly 2.43 key passes and a 7.37 average rating — anchor the score in the adequate-starter band without pushing it higher.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 60.2 sits 3.2 points below the FQ score of 63.39 — within the ±5 stable range, but trending slightly downward. This is not a meaningful concern at current magnitude, though the direction warrants monitoring over the next 5–8 matches.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Luka Modrić

Modrić scores 62.65 on the FQ scale — nearly identical to this player's 63.39 — reflecting similar aggregate output levels, though Modrić's profile carries far more established dimensional depth than the null sub-scores seen here.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
25
Minutes
2024
Goals
11
Assists
2
Key passes
61
Rating
7.38
Tackles
29
Shots on target
22
Successful dribbles
24
Clean sheets
2
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 75.0Form 74.5
Previous
TQ 72.9Form 72.5
Current
TQ 71.0Form 70.8
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.51
Assists
0.09
Key Passes
2.56
Tackles
1.35
Rating
7.38
Elliott Anderson

Anderson's 64.21 FQ score places him in the same adequate-starter band, with both players occupying a central midfield role at a similar production tier; Anderson's profile likely carries more granular sub-score data, making direct quality comparison difficult.

Compare →
Sergi Darder Moll

Darder Moll's 62.32 FQ score is the closest match in this comparable set, reflecting a similar mid-tier central midfield profile; the key differentiator will be sub-score composition once dimensional data becomes available for the evaluated player.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2024 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Strong current rating
Live rating sits at 7.38 in the current season snapshot.
Direct output
13 combined goals and assists are showing in live coverage.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Dimensional data coverage

All four role-critical sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) are null, which is unusual for a central midfielder with 1,850 minutes played. This prevents any assessment of where the player is genuinely strong or weak within the position, and limits the reliability of the overall score as a role-specific signal.

Assist output

0.10 assists per 90 is low for a central midfielder who generates 2.43 key passes per 90 — the conversion from chance creation to direct assists is notably thin, suggesting either poor finishing from recipients or a tendency toward lower-probability opportunities.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →