Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga central midfielder sitting at 63.39 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, but without standout production in any measurable dimension. The most distinctive feature of this profile is its uniformity: 0.54 goals per 90 and 2.43 key passes per 90 suggest a player contributing across multiple areas without excelling in any single one. Confidence in the score is solid at 0.80 across 23 matches and 1,850 minutes.
With all role-specific sub-scores (creation, progression, defense, finishing) returning null, the FQ score of 63.39 is driven entirely by aggregate output metrics rather than dimensional quality. The per-90 numbers — particularly 2.43 key passes and a 7.37 average rating — anchor the score in the adequate-starter band without pushing it higher.
Form score of 60.2 sits 3.2 points below the FQ score of 63.39 — within the ±5 stable range, but trending slightly downward. This is not a meaningful concern at current magnitude, though the direction warrants monitoring over the next 5–8 matches.
Modrić scores 62.65 on the FQ scale — nearly identical to this player's 63.39 — reflecting similar aggregate output levels, though Modrić's profile carries far more established dimensional depth than the null sub-scores seen here.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Anderson's 64.21 FQ score places him in the same adequate-starter band, with both players occupying a central midfield role at a similar production tier; Anderson's profile likely carries more granular sub-score data, making direct quality comparison difficult.
Darder Moll's 62.32 FQ score is the closest match in this comparable set, reflecting a similar mid-tier central midfield profile; the key differentiator will be sub-score composition once dimensional data becomes available for the evaluated player.
All four role-critical sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) are null, which is unusual for a central midfielder with 1,850 minutes played. This prevents any assessment of where the player is genuinely strong or weak within the position, and limits the reliability of the overall score as a role-specific signal.
0.10 assists per 90 is low for a central midfielder who generates 2.43 key passes per 90 — the conversion from chance creation to direct assists is notably thin, suggesting either poor finishing from recipients or a tendency toward lower-probability opportunities.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →