Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A functional central midfielder in Ligue 1 sitting at an FQ Score of 54.06 — squarely in the typical performer band (50-59) and not yet distinguishing himself from the positional baseline. His most notable per-90 output is 1.54 tackles and 1.37 key passes, suggesting a dual-contribution profile, but without granular sub-scores the depth of that contribution cannot be fully verified. Across 27 matches and 2,042 minutes, he is a consistent presence rather than a difference-maker.
With all role-specific sub-scores (creation, progression, defense, possession control, physical duels) returning null, the FQ Score of 54.06 is driven entirely by aggregate output — 0.40 goals per 90 and a 7.23 average rating provide a functional but unspectacular baseline that places him mid-table among central midfielders. The absence of granular breakdowns prevents any elite dimension from pulling the score higher.
Form score of 52.39 sits 1.67 points below the FQ Score of 54.06 — a delta within the ±5 stable range, indicating no meaningful decline or uplift. Trajectory is flat; there is no momentum signal in either direction.
McGinn's FQ Score of 55.25 places him just above this player in the same typical-performer band, with a similar all-action central midfield profile; McGinn's higher-profile league context (Premier League) likely inflates the difficulty of his comparable output.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Parejo's FQ Score of 52.26 reflects a comparable aggregate contribution level, though Parejo is a more distinctly pass-first midfielder whereas this player's tackle rate suggests a more balanced two-way role.
Mkhitaryan's FQ Score of 51.78 sits just below, making him the closest floor comparison; Mkhitaryan historically skews toward creation and final-third involvement, a dimension this player's null sub-scores prevent direct comparison on.
1.37 key passes per 90 is a surface-level creation signal, but with the creation sub-score returning null, there is no verified quality layer beneath it — xA, chance quality, or progressive passing data are absent, limiting confidence in his playmaking ceiling.
1.54 tackles per 90 suggests defensive engagement, but the defense sub-score is null, meaning consistency, positioning, and interception volume cannot be assessed. For a central midfielder in Ligue 1, this gap matters when evaluating two-way reliability.
No progression sub-score is available, and no carry or pass-into-final-third data is present in the input. For a central midfielder, ball progression is a core role demand — its absence from the data profile is a meaningful analytical gap.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →