TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Corentin Tolisso

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Olympique Lyonnais
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Aug 3, 1994 (31)
Jersey Number
#8
League
Ligue 1
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Corentin Tolisso
Corentin Tolisso
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Olympique Lyonnais
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Aug 3, 1994 (31)
Jersey Number
#8
TactiQ Score
69.5
90% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
69.5
Form Score
68.5
Confidence
90%
Role
central_midfielder
League
Ligue 1
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.42
Assists
0.17
Key Pass
1.44
Tackles
1.48
Rating
7.28
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A functional central midfielder in Ligue 1 sitting at an FQ Score of 54.06 — squarely in the typical performer band (50-59) and not yet distinguishing himself from the positional baseline. His most notable per-90 output is 1.54 tackles and 1.37 key passes, suggesting a dual-contribution profile, but without granular sub-scores the depth of that contribution cannot be fully verified. Across 27 matches and 2,042 minutes, he is a consistent presence rather than a difference-maker.

Why this score

With all role-specific sub-scores (creation, progression, defense, possession control, physical duels) returning null, the FQ Score of 54.06 is driven entirely by aggregate output — 0.40 goals per 90 and a 7.23 average rating provide a functional but unspectacular baseline that places him mid-table among central midfielders. The absence of granular breakdowns prevents any elite dimension from pulling the score higher.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 52.39 sits 1.67 points below the FQ Score of 54.06 — a delta within the ±5 stable range, indicating no meaningful decline or uplift. Trajectory is flat; there is no momentum signal in either direction.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
John McGinn

McGinn's FQ Score of 55.25 places him just above this player in the same typical-performer band, with a similar all-action central midfield profile; McGinn's higher-profile league context (Premier League) likely inflates the difficulty of his comparable output.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
29
Minutes
2217
Goals
11
Assists
4
Key passes
34
Rating
7.28
Tackles
35
Shots on target
26
Successful dribbles
4
Clean sheets
13
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 63.7Form 63.3
Previous
TQ 70.5Form 70.3
Current
TQ 68.6Form 68.5
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.42
Assists
0.17
Key Passes
1.44
Tackles
1.48
Rating
7.28
Daniel Parejo Muñoz

Parejo's FQ Score of 52.26 reflects a comparable aggregate contribution level, though Parejo is a more distinctly pass-first midfielder whereas this player's tackle rate suggests a more balanced two-way role.

Compare →
Henrikh Mkhitaryan

Mkhitaryan's FQ Score of 51.78 sits just below, making him the closest floor comparison; Mkhitaryan historically skews toward creation and final-third involvement, a dimension this player's null sub-scores prevent direct comparison on.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2217 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Strong current rating
Live rating sits at 7.28 in the current season snapshot.
Direct output
15 combined goals and assists are showing in live coverage.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Creation depth

1.37 key passes per 90 is a surface-level creation signal, but with the creation sub-score returning null, there is no verified quality layer beneath it — xA, chance quality, or progressive passing data are absent, limiting confidence in his playmaking ceiling.

Defensive contribution

1.54 tackles per 90 suggests defensive engagement, but the defense sub-score is null, meaning consistency, positioning, and interception volume cannot be assessed. For a central midfielder in Ligue 1, this gap matters when evaluating two-way reliability.

Progression

No progression sub-score is available, and no carry or pass-into-final-third data is present in the input. For a central midfielder, ball progression is a core role demand — its absence from the data profile is a meaningful analytical gap.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →