Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga central midfielder sitting at an FQ Score of 50.78 — squarely in the typical performer band, with no standout dimension pulling the profile above the median. The most notable data point is what is absent: all role-specific sub-scores (creation, progression, defense) are null, meaning no single area of midfield contribution registers as measurably above baseline. Per-90 numbers tell a functional story — 1.01 key passes, 1.5 tackles, and a 7.15 average rating — but nothing that separates this player from a standard Bundesliga starter.
The FQ Score of 50.78 is driven primarily by the absence of any sub-score above threshold across creation, progression, and defense — all return null, indicating no dimension of midfield output is registering as a clear strength. The per-90 profile is functional but undifferentiated for the role.
Form score of 50.12 sits just 0.66 points below the FQ Score of 50.78 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful trend in either direction; this player is performing exactly in line with their established level across the current 26-match, 2,217-minute sample.
Nearly identical FQ Score (50.58 vs 50.78) places both in the typical performer band for central midfielders; López Cabrera provides a useful peer benchmark but plays in a different league context.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Bellegarde's FQ Score of 51.33 is the closest ceiling comparison in this peer group, suggesting a marginal output edge — likely reflecting slightly stronger sub-score contributions in at least one midfield dimension.
Longstaff's FQ Score of 49.81 sits just below, making him the floor of this comparable set; both players occupy the same median-performer tier with no clear breakout dimension.
1.01 key passes per 90 is the headline creation figure, but with a null creation sub-score and just 0.08 assists per 90, the output falls short of what is expected from a central midfielder in a top-five league.
0.41 goals per 90 is a notable number for a central midfielder, but without a finishing sub-score to validate it, the sample context is unclear — and 0.08 assists per 90 means the combined direct output remains limited.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →