TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Rasmus Kristensen

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Eintracht Frankfurt
Position
Right Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Jul 11, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#13
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Rasmus Kristensen
Rasmus Kristensen
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Eintracht Frankfurt
Position
Right Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Jul 11, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#13
TactiQ Score
66.9
77% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
66.9
Form Score
61.8
Confidence
77%
Role
fullback_wingback
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.12
Assists
—
Key Pass
0.49
Tackles
2.83
Rating
6.83
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A fringe-level fullback/wingback in the Bundesliga sitting at 47.54 on the FQ scale — below the 50-59 typical performer band and below baseline for the position. Across 1,434 minutes this season, the most visible output is 2.89 tackles per 90, while attacking contribution is thin at 0.5 key passes per 90 and 0.13 goals per 90. The absence of all role-specific sub-scores (creation, progression, defense) limits how precisely the profile can be read, though the overall picture is one of a player operating at the margins of starter quality.

Why this score

The FQ score of 47.54 is driven primarily by below-baseline overall production for a fullback/wingback role, compounded by the fact that all dimension sub-scores (creation, progression, defense) are null — meaning no single area of strength could pull the score upward. The 6.89 average match rating and modest per-90 output reinforce the mid-to-low positioning.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 45.0 sits 2.5 points below the FQ score of 47.54 — within the ±5 stable band, but on the softer side. This is a stable-to-marginally-declining picture rather than a meaningful concern; recent performances are slightly below the player's own baseline rather than sharply deteriorating.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Ali Abdi

Comparable FQ score of 47.95 places him at a near-identical level of overall output for the fullback/wingback role; the marginal gap of 0.41 FQ points suggests very similar production profiles, though individual role execution details are unavailable for deeper differentiation.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
21
Minutes
1463
Goals
2
Key passes
8
Rating
6.83
Tackles
46
Shots on target
6
Successful dribbles
14
Clean sheets
4
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 61.4Form 61.1
Previous
TQ 68.5Form 68.2
Current
TQ 62.1Form 61.8
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.12
Assists
—
Key Passes
0.49
Tackles
2.83
Rating
6.83
Nordi Mukiele Mulere

At 48.61, Mukiele Mulere scores fractionally higher, suggesting a similar fringe-starter profile; his slightly elevated score may reflect marginally stronger positional metrics, but both players occupy the same below-baseline band.

Compare →
Johan Andrés Mojica Palacio

Mojica Palacio's 48.63 FQ score mirrors this player's standing closely; like the others in this comparison group, he sits just below the 50-mark threshold that separates typical performers from fringe contributors.

Compare →
Defensive activity
46 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Attacking creation

0.5 key passes per 90 is thin for a fullback/wingback role where progressive and creative output is a core expectation. No assists data is available, which itself signals limited recorded creative contribution.

Goal involvement

0.13 goals per 90 is low even by fullback standards, and with no assist figure recorded, direct goal involvement appears minimal across 20 appearances.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →