TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Mathias Jensen

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Brentford
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Jan 1, 1996 (30)
Jersey Number
#8
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Mathias Jensen
Mathias Jensen
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Brentford
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Jan 1, 1996 (30)
Jersey Number
#8
TactiQ Score
68.2
91% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
68.2
Form Score
66.5
Confidence
91%
Role
central_midfielder
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.13
Assists
0.04
Key Pass
1.36
Tackles
1.70
Rating
6.89
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A central midfielder in the Premier League sitting at 53.01 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range. The most distinctive feature here is not a standout strength but a consistent, unremarkable profile: 1.44 key passes and 1.53 tackles per 90 suggest a player who covers both sides of the midfield role without excelling in either. Across 32 appearances and 1,938 minutes, the output has been stable but limited.

Why this score

With all six role-specific sub-scores returning null, the FQ score of 53.01 is driven entirely by aggregate per-90 production — 0.14 goals, 0.05 assists, and a 6.91 average rating that collectively place this player at the lower end of adequate for a Premier League central midfielder. The absence of granular dimension data prevents identifying any single area of strength that could push the score higher.

Form Trajectory

Form is stable — the form score of 51.93 sits just 1.1 points below the FQ score of 53.01, well within the ±5 threshold for a flat trajectory. There is no meaningful acceleration or decline signal in recent matches.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Daniel Parejo Muñoz

Parejo's FQ score of 52.26 places him at nearly the same overall level; both profiles reflect a central midfielder with adequate but unspectacular aggregate output, though Parejo is historically associated with higher passing volume and set-piece involvement.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
34
Minutes
2118
Goals
3
Assists
1
Key passes
32
Rating
6.89
Tackles
40
Shots on target
8
Successful dribbles
18
Clean sheets
10
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 68.1Form 67.9
Previous
TQ 64.3Form 64.2
Current
TQ 66.7Form 66.5
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.13
Assists
0.04
Key Passes
1.36
Tackles
1.70
Rating
6.89
Henrikh Mkhitaryan

Mkhitaryan's 51.78 FQ score reflects a similarly mid-range production profile at this point in his career, though his role leans more toward advanced creation whereas this player's tackle rate of 1.53 per 90 suggests a more balanced two-way brief.

Compare →
Jean-Ricner Bellegarde

Bellegarde's 51.33 FQ score is the closest match in terms of overall output level; both sit in the typical performer band, though Bellegarde's profile is more physically intensive compared to the key-pass-oriented numbers seen here.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2118 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
40 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
10 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Goal and assist contribution

0.14 goals and 0.05 assists per 90 represent minimal direct output for a central midfielder in the Premier League, where higher involvement in the final third is typically expected from starters.

Creative output

1.44 key passes per 90 is functional but not a differentiator at this level; without a creation sub-score to contextualise it, the ceiling on this dimension remains unclear but the raw number does not suggest a playmaking profile.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →