TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Matty Cash

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Aston Villa
Position
Right Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Aug 7, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#2
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Matty Cash
Matty Cash
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Aston Villa
Position
Right Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Aug 7, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#2
TactiQ Score
66.6
96% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
66.6
Form Score
64.9
Confidence
96%
Role
fullback_wingback
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.10
Assists
0.10
Key Pass
0.93
Tackles
2.05
Rating
6.92
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A fringe-level Premier League fullback/wingback sitting at 47.84 on the FQ scale — below the 50-59 typical performer band and short of the adequate starter threshold. Across 31 appearances and 2,721 minutes this season, output is limited: 0.1 goals per 90, 0.07 assists per 90, and a 6.92 average match rating. No sub-score dimension clears the 70 threshold required to identify a genuine strength.

Why this score

The FQ Score of 47.84 is primarily explained by the absence of any measurable standout dimension — all role-specific sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense, possession control, physical duel) are null, meaning no area of contribution is quantifiably above baseline. For a fullback/wingback, the expectation is defensive solidity and/or attacking output; neither is evidenced here.

Form Trajectory

Form score (47.96) and FQ score (47.84) are separated by just 0.12 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no upward or downward momentum; output has been consistently flat across the season.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Ali Abdi

Scores virtually identically at 47.95 FQ, reflecting a similar fringe-starter profile; the key distinction is positional context, which may differ in how each player's limited output is deployed.

Compare →
Nordi Mukiele Mulere
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
33
Minutes
2888
Goals
3
Assists
3
Key passes
30
Rating
6.89
Tackles
64
Shots on target
10
Successful dribbles
11
Clean sheets
8
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 63.4Form 63.0
Previous
TQ 64.0Form 63.6
Current
TQ 65.3Form 64.9
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.10
Assists
0.10
Key Passes
0.93
Tackles
2.05
Rating
6.92

A close FQ match at 48.61, suggesting comparable overall contribution levels; Mukiele's experience in higher-profile European leagues may give his score a different contextual weight.

Compare →
Johan Andrés Mojica Palacio

At 48.63 FQ, Mojica Palacio sits marginally above this player in the same performance band; both profile as below-baseline fullbacks without a clear standout dimension.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2888 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
64 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
8 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Attacking contribution

0.07 assists per 90 and 0.93 key passes per 90 are below what is typically expected from a wingback role, where creation and crossing are primary offensive outputs.

Defensive output

1.89 tackles per 90 is the only defensive indicator available, but with the defense sub-score null, it is not possible to confirm whether this translates to meaningful defensive contribution relative to positional peers.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →