Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A fringe-level Premier League fullback/wingback sitting at 47.84 on the FQ scale — below the 50-59 typical performer band and short of the adequate starter threshold. Across 31 appearances and 2,721 minutes this season, output is limited: 0.1 goals per 90, 0.07 assists per 90, and a 6.92 average match rating. No sub-score dimension clears the 70 threshold required to identify a genuine strength.
The FQ Score of 47.84 is primarily explained by the absence of any measurable standout dimension — all role-specific sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense, possession control, physical duel) are null, meaning no area of contribution is quantifiably above baseline. For a fullback/wingback, the expectation is defensive solidity and/or attacking output; neither is evidenced here.
Form score (47.96) and FQ score (47.84) are separated by just 0.12 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no upward or downward momentum; output has been consistently flat across the season.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
A close FQ match at 48.61, suggesting comparable overall contribution levels; Mukiele's experience in higher-profile European leagues may give his score a different contextual weight.
At 48.63 FQ, Mojica Palacio sits marginally above this player in the same performance band; both profile as below-baseline fullbacks without a clear standout dimension.
0.07 assists per 90 and 0.93 key passes per 90 are below what is typically expected from a wingback role, where creation and crossing are primary offensive outputs.
1.89 tackles per 90 is the only defensive indicator available, but with the defense sub-score null, it is not possible to confirm whether this translates to meaningful defensive contribution relative to positional peers.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →