Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga fullback/wingback sitting at 56.96 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, but without a standout dimension to separate them from the positional pack. The most distinctive on-ball signal is 1.98 key passes per 90, which is a meaningful creative contribution for the role, paired with 0.40 assists per 90. All sub-scores are null, meaning no single dimension can be confirmed as elite or critically weak from the underlying model.
With all component sub-scores returning null, the FQ score of 56.96 is driven by aggregate per-90 output rather than any identified dimension of excellence. The absence of a breakout sub-score — no finishing, creation, progression, defense, or physical duel rating above threshold — is itself the primary explanation: this player meets positional minimums without pulling the composite upward.
Form score of 59.17 sits 2.2 points above the FQ score of 56.96 — within the ±5 stable band, but nudging toward a modest upward lean. This is stable-to-improving rather than a meaningful surge; no concern flags on trajectory.
Both sit in the mid-50s FQ range as attacking-minded fullbacks with comparable composite scores (56.05 vs 56.96), though Hakimi's profile is built in a higher-profile league context which may suppress his score relative to raw output.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Digne's FQ of 54.21 reflects a similar adequate-starter profile at left fullback/wingback, with the key difference being Digne's more established creative pedigree from set-piece delivery, a dimension not confirmed for this player.
Dalot's 53.63 FQ score places him just below this player in the same positional tier; both profile as reliable depth options rather than difference-makers, though Dalot operates in a higher-difficulty league environment.
For a fullback/wingback, defensive sub-score is a core role requirement — but it returns null here. The 1.88 tackles per 90 is a usable signal, but without a confirmed defense sub-score the model cannot validate whether this meets the positional baseline.
Progression and creation sub-scores are both null despite 1.98 key passes per 90 and 0.40 assists per 90 — metrics that would typically feed these dimensions. The gap between visible per-90 numbers and absent sub-scores limits confidence in how sustainably these contributions are being generated.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →