TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Kyle Walker-Peters

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
West Ham United
Position
Right Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Apr 13, 1997 (29)
Jersey Number
#2
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Kyle Walker-Peters
Kyle Walker-Peters
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
West Ham United
Position
Right Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Apr 13, 1997 (29)
Jersey Number
#2
TactiQ Score
66.5
76% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
66.5
Form Score
62.1
Confidence
76%
Role
fullback_wingback
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.07
Assists
—
Key Pass
0.49
Tackles
3.19
Rating
6.70
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A fringe-level Premier League fullback/wingback sitting at 48.77 on the FQ scale — below the baseline for the role and outside the typical starter tier. The most notable data point is 3.21 tackles per 90, which signals defensive engagement, but the absence of all dimension sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense all null) means no aspect of their game can be confirmed as a genuine strength. At 1,232 minutes across 21 matches, the sample is meaningful enough to treat this score as representative.

Why this score

With an FQ score of 48.77, this player sits below the 50-point baseline that marks a typical performer. The primary driver is the absence of any sub-score above threshold combined with limited attacking output — 0.07 goals per 90 and no recorded assists — which is insufficient production even for a defensively-oriented fullback role in the Premier League.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 48.34 sits just 0.43 points below the FQ score of 48.77 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend; performance has been flat and consistent at a below-baseline level across the current sample.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Johan Andrés Mojica Palacio

Nearly identical FQ score (48.63 vs 48.77) places them in the same below-baseline fullback tier; Mojica Palacio's profile is drawn from a different league context, which may account for subtle differences in how that score is composed.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
22
Minutes
1297
Goals
1
Key passes
7
Rating
6.70
Tackles
46
Shots on target
3
Successful dribbles
16
Clean sheets
4
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 64.4Form 64.1
Previous
TQ 65.3Form 64.9
Current
TQ 62.3Form 62.1
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.07
Assists
—
Key Passes
0.49
Tackles
3.19
Rating
6.70
Nordi Mukiele Mulere

FQ score of 48.61 makes him a close match in overall output level; Mukiele Mulere has historically operated with more positional versatility, which may give his score a different sub-score distribution despite the similar headline figure.

Compare →
Ali Abdi

Slightly lower FQ score of 47.95 puts Abdi just below this player on the same tier; the gap of under one point suggests near-equivalent overall contribution, though role context and league difficulty may differ.

Compare →
Defensive activity
46 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Attacking contribution

0.07 goals per 90 and no recorded assists, with key passes at 0.51 per 90 — below what is expected of a Premier League fullback/wingback who is required to contribute in the final third.

Sub-score visibility

All role-critical dimensions — defense, progression, creation — return null scores, meaning no area of performance can be verified as meeting baseline. This is a meaningful transparency gap for a position with clear measurable responsibilities.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →