Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga striker sitting at 61.56 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, but without standout production in any measurable dimension. The most distinctive data point is the per-90 output: 0.70 goals and 0.21 assists across 1,287 minutes, with 1.05 key passes per 90 suggesting broader involvement than a pure finisher. No sub-scores are available, which prevents a full picture of where this player genuinely excels or struggles.
The 61.56 FQ score reflects a player meeting baseline striker expectations without exceeding them — but the absence of all sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense, possession control, physical duel) means the score is driven primarily by per-90 volume metrics and overall rating (7.04), rather than quality-adjusted dimensions. This limits confidence in the precise calibration of the score.
Form score (60.64) sits just 0.92 points below the FQ score (61.56), placing this player firmly in stable territory — no meaningful upward or downward trend is detectable. The delta is well within the ±5 threshold, and the risk agent flags no volatility concerns beyond the inability to assess sub-score consistency.
Nearly identical FQ score (61.48 vs 61.56) places them in the same adequate-starter band; Richarlison's profile is better documented with sub-score visibility, giving him a clearer strength-weakness read than this player.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Jiménez scores marginally higher at 62.17 and represents a similar profile of a physically present striker operating in the 60–65 FQ range; the key difference is Jiménez's longer track record at top-flight level provides higher scoring confidence.
Aubameyang's 62.88 FQ score sits just above this player's 61.56, reflecting a comparable current output level; Aubameyang's historical peak separates him in terms of career trajectory, even if present-day production is similarly mid-tier.
All six role-specific sub-scores are null, meaning conversion efficiency, xG performance, chance creation quality, and progression contribution cannot be assessed. For a striker, the absence of a finishing sub-score is the most critical gap — it is impossible to determine whether the 0.70 goals per 90 reflects clinical finishing or high-volume shooting.
1.05 key passes per 90 is a notable volume figure for a striker, but without a creation sub-score, the quality and difficulty of those chances cannot be evaluated. This limits any conclusion about genuine playmaking contribution.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →