Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A fullback/wingback sitting at 47.27 on the FQ scale — below the 50-point midpoint and in the fringe-to-typical range for the position. The most distinctive feature of this profile is what is absent: all role-critical sub-scores (defense, progression, creation) are null, meaning the aggregate signal alone is driving the evaluation. With 2,387 minutes across 30 matches, sample size is not the issue — this is a player not meeting positional baseline expectations across measurable dimensions.
The FQ score of 47.27 is anchored by a below-baseline aggregate with no sub-score dimension clearing the threshold to pull it higher. Per-90 output — 0.04 goals, 0.08 assists, 0.94 key passes, 1.96 tackles — reflects modest contribution across both ends of the pitch for a modern fullback/wingback role.
Form score of 45.19 sits just 2.08 points below the FQ score of 47.27 — within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend; output has been consistently modest throughout the season.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Aina's FQ score of 46.18 reflects a similar positional profile and output level, though Aina operates with a known attacking fullback profile that provides clearer dimensional context than this player's null sub-scores allow.
Mukiele's 48.61 FQ score is the ceiling of this comparable group — marginally above this player's 47.27 — with the difference likely attributable to slightly higher dimensional contribution in progression or defensive metrics.
0.04 goals and 0.08 assists per 90 are low for a wingback role where attacking returns are a primary expectation. 0.94 key passes per 90 sits in the middle range and does not compensate for the lack of direct goal involvement.
1.96 tackles per 90 is a modest return for a fullback/wingback, where defensive actions are a baseline requirement. Without a defense sub-score to contextualise quality, this volume figure alone does not indicate positional solidity.
All role-specific sub-scores — defense, progression, creation — are null despite 91% data completeness and 30 matches played. This prevents any multi-dimensional read and is itself a signal of limited standout contribution across the position's core pillars.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →