TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Marius Bülter

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
FC Köln
Position
Left Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
Mar 29, 1993 (33)
Jersey Number
#30
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Marius Bülter
Marius Bülter
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
FC Köln
Position
Left Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
Mar 29, 1993 (33)
Jersey Number
#30
TactiQ Score
66.6
85% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
66.6
Form Score
62.3
Confidence
85%
Role
winger
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.25
Assists
0.25
Key Pass
1.52
Tackles
0.38
Rating
6.87
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Bundesliga winger sitting precisely at the median of the FQ scale (50.27), with no dimension standing out above the baseline. Across 29 matches and 1,352 minutes this season, the per-90 output — 0.20 goals, 0.27 assists, 1.6 key passes — reflects a player meeting minimum positional expectations without exceeding them in any attacking category. All role-specific sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression) are null, which limits deeper profiling but does not mask a standout quality that would otherwise lift the overall score.

Why this score

The FQ score of 50.27 is driven primarily by the absence of any above-baseline production signal: no sub-score clears 70, and the per-90 attacking numbers (0.20 goals, 1.6 key passes) are consistent with a fringe contributor rather than a reliable starter at Bundesliga level. The null sub-scores prevent a more precise breakdown, but the aggregate output is unambiguously mid-table.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 48.62 sits 1.65 points below the season FQ score of 50.27 — within the ±5 stable band, indicating no sharp deterioration but also no upward momentum. The trend is flat-to-marginally-soft rather than a meaningful concern.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Ismaïla Sarr

Nearly identical FQ score (50.29 vs 50.27) places both players at the same median tier, though Sarr's profile is built on a higher-profile career trajectory that makes the shared score more of a current-form convergence than a long-term equivalence.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
31
Minutes
1513
Goals
5
Assists
4
Key passes
25
Rating
6.89
Tackles
6
Shots on target
17
Successful dribbles
6
Clean sheets
2
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 61.6Form 61.2
Previous
TQ 63.6Form 64.3
Current
TQ 62.4Form 62.3
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.25
Assists
0.25
Key Passes
1.52
Tackles
0.38
Rating
6.87
Jorge De Frutos Sebastián

Marginally higher FQ score (50.95) reflects a similarly limited attacking output ceiling, though De Frutos operates in a different league context which may suppress or inflate the comparison.

Compare →
Marcus Edwards

Slightly lower FQ score (49.25) puts Edwards just below this player, with both sitting in the fringe-to-adequate starter range; Edwards' profile is more creation-oriented, which may represent a stylistic difference within the same performance band.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Attacking output

0.20 goals and 0.27 assists per 90 are below what Bundesliga wingers typically need to justify regular starts; 1.6 key passes per 90 is a modest creation rate for the role and does not compensate for the low direct goal involvement.

Sub-score visibility

All role-critical sub-scores — finishing, creation, progression, and defensive contribution — are null, meaning no single dimension can be confirmed as a reliable strength. This analytical gap is itself a signal: no metric is clearly elevated enough to surface.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →