TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Jorge de Frutos

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Rayo Vallecano
Position
Right Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
Feb 20, 1997 (29)
Jersey Number
#19
League
La Liga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Jorge de Frutos
Jorge de Frutos
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Rayo Vallecano
Position
Right Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
Feb 20, 1997 (29)
Jersey Number
#19
TactiQ Score
62.3
93% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
62.3
Form Score
62.0
Confidence
93%
Role
winger
League
La Liga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.40
Assists
0.04
Key Pass
1.04
Tackles
1.08
Rating
6.91
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A La Liga winger sitting at 50.95 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band, with 31 appearances and 2,198 minutes this season providing a reliable sample. The most distinctive data point is the absence of any sub-score breakdowns, meaning what production exists is spread thinly enough that no single dimension stands out. At 0.41 goals per 90 and just 0.04 assists per 90, attacking output is below what drives higher-scoring wingers in this league.

Why this score

The FQ score of 50.95 is anchored by limited multi-dimensional output — 0.04 assists per 90 is particularly low for a winger, and the absence of any sub-score above threshold means no dimension is pulling the overall rating upward. The 6.89 average match rating across 31 games reflects consistent but unremarkable contribution.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 53.38 sits 2.43 points above the FQ score of 50.95 — within the ±5 stable band, but nudging upward. This is a stable-to-marginally-improving picture, not a breakout trend.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Iñaki Williams Arthuer

Near-identical FQ score (50.83) places him in the same typical-performer band; Williams tends to offer more physical duel involvement, whereas this player's profile is more evenly distributed across a low output baseline.

Compare →
Demarai Gray
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
33
Minutes
2319
Goals
10
Assists
1
Key passes
27
Rating
6.90
Tackles
27
Shots on target
26
Successful dribbles
27
Clean sheets
11
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 58.9Form 58.6
Previous
TQ 62.9Form 62.7
Current
TQ 61.2Form 62.0
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.40
Assists
0.04
Key Passes
1.04
Tackles
1.08
Rating
6.91

Gray's 51.6 FQ score reflects a similar ceiling of consistent but non-decisive winger contribution; Gray has historically shown higher key-pass volume in comparable samples.

Compare →
Ismaïla Sarr

Sarr's 50.29 FQ score sits just below, sharing the same mid-tier output profile; Sarr's comparable seasons have featured more variance in finishing attempts, giving him a clearer dimensional identity despite a similar overall rating.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2319 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Direct output
11 combined goals and assists are showing in live coverage.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
27 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Chance creation

0.04 assists per 90 across 2,198 minutes is a meaningful gap for a winger — creation is a core positional requirement, and this volume suggests limited direct involvement in goal-building sequences.

Attacking combination

1.06 key passes per 90 is a modest return for the role; combined with the assist rate, it points to a winger who occupies the position without consistently unlocking defences.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →