Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga center-back sitting at 48.43 on the FQ scale — below the 50-59 "typical performer" band and firmly in fringe territory for a top-five European league. Across 29 matches (2,565 minutes), the most visible output is 1.19 tackles per 90 and a 6.95 average match rating, neither of which signals a meaningful defensive presence. All role-specific sub-scores (defense, progression, possession control, physical duel) are null, meaning the FQ score is driven by aggregate signal rather than dimensional strength.
The FQ score of 48.43 is pulled down by a below-baseline aggregate with no sub-score dimension clearing the threshold for above-average contribution. The absence of a computable defense sub-score — the primary production metric for a center-back — is itself a signal: it reflects insufficient volume or quality of defensive actions to register a meaningful dimensional score.
Form score of 49.28 sits just 0.85 points above the FQ score of 48.43 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward trajectory signal; performance has been consistently flat across the current season.
Nearly identical FQ score (48.49 vs 48.43) places them at the same performance tier; Cabrera Sasía's profile offers a direct peer benchmark, though league context may differ.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Alderete Fernández scores marginally higher at 49.62, suggesting a similar fringe-to-adequate ceiling, but edges ahead on aggregate output.
Torres scores slightly lower at 47.13, making him the weakest of the three comparables, though all three cluster tightly in the 47–50 band that defines this player's peer group.
1.19 tackles per 90 is the only visible defensive metric, and no defense sub-score could be computed — unusual for a center-back with 2,565 minutes played. This suggests low volume or low impact across interceptions, duels, and clearances.
0.11 goals per 90 and 0.04 assists per 90 are minimal even by center-back standards, and 0.35 key passes per 90 indicates limited involvement in build-up or set-piece delivery.
All role-specific sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense, possession control, physical duel) returned null across 29 matches, indicating no dimension where this player registers above-baseline output.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →