TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Lautaro Martínez

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Inter
Position
Centre Forward
Also: Striker
Date of Birth
Aug 22, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#10
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Lautaro Martínez
Lautaro Martínez
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Inter
Position
Centre Forward
Also: Striker
Date of Birth
Aug 22, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#10
TactiQ Score
80.0
89% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
80.0
Form Score
78.8
Confidence
89%
Role
striker
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.75
Assists
0.26
Key Pass
1.63
Tackles
0.97
Rating
7.37
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 9, 2026

A consistent Serie A striker sitting at 70.31 on the TQ scale — solidly above the typical starter threshold but short of the elite tier. His most distinctive attribute is his per-90 output: 0.73 goals and 1.47 key passes per 90 minutes across 1,962 minutes this season paint a picture of a striker who contributes beyond just finishing. All sub-scores are null, which limits deeper dimensional analysis, but the underlying per-90 numbers and 0.84 confidence rating confirm this is a reliable, data-backed read.

Why this score

The TQ Score of 70.31 is driven primarily by consistent per-90 production — 0.73 goals and 0.18 assists — across a meaningful 26-match sample, placing him comfortably above baseline for the striker role. The absence of sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression all null) prevents any single dimension from pulling the score higher or lower, anchoring the result in aggregate output rather than dimensional excellence.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 71.91 sits just 1.6 points above the TQ Score of 70.31 — well within the ±5 stable band, indicating no meaningful upward or downward momentum. This player is delivering close to his established baseline with no trajectory concern.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Amine Gouiri

Both profile as attacking contributors in a similar TQ range (Gouiri at 67.41 vs 70.31 here), though this player edges ahead on overall score and logs a higher goals-per-90 rate.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
28
Minutes
2048
Goals
17
Assists
6
Key passes
37
Rating
7.37
Tackles
22
Shots on target
37
Successful dribbles
20
Clean sheets
15
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 80.0Form 82.3
Previous
TQ 70.6Form 71.2
Current
TQ 78.0Form 78.8
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.75
Assists
0.26
Key Passes
1.63
Tackles
0.97
Rating
7.37
Serge Gnabry

Comparable TQ scores (Gnabry at 67.34) reflect similar aggregate output levels, but Gnabry's profile is built more on wide attacking contribution whereas this player operates as a central striker.

Compare →
Iago Aspas Juncal

Aspas Juncal (66.39) shares the profile of a technically involved striker who contributes to build-up — reflected here in 1.47 key passes per 90 — though this player scores higher overall.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2048 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Strong current rating
Live rating sits at 7.37 in the current season snapshot.
Direct output
23 combined goals and assists are showing in live coverage.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Dimensional transparency

All role-critical sub-scores — finishing, creation, progression — are null, meaning efficiency metrics like conversion rate and xG performance cannot be assessed. The 0.73 goals per 90 is encouraging, but without shot quality or xG data, output quality remains unverified.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →