TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Daniel Heuer Fernandes

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Hamburger SV
Position
Goalkeeper
Date of Birth
Nov 13, 1992 (33)
Jersey Number
#1
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Daniel Heuer Fernandes
Daniel Heuer Fernandes
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Hamburger SV
Position
Goalkeeper
Date of Birth
Nov 13, 1992 (33)
Jersey Number
#1
TactiQ Score
70.5
81% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
70.5
Form Score
67.3
Confidence
81%
Role
goalkeeper
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
—
Key Pass
0.03
Tackles
—
Rating
6.88
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A Bundesliga goalkeeper sitting at 58.77 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, meeting positional baseline without standing out in any measurable dimension. With 2,790 minutes across 31 matches this season, the sample is substantial and the score is reliable (confidence: 0.80), but the absence of goalkeeper-specific sub-scores (save percentage, xG prevented, distribution) means the full picture remains incomplete. What is clear is that this is a competent, unspectacular operator in a competitive league context.

Why this score

The FQ score of 58.77 is anchored by a mid-range consensus across all three evaluation agents (59, 72, 62), with no sub-score exceeding 70 and critical goalkeeper metrics — saves per 90, save percentage, goals conceded vs xG prevented — absent from the data. Without those dimensions, there is no evidence to push the score above the adequate-starter band.

Form Trajectory

Form is on a mild upward trajectory: the form score of 64.36 sits 5.6 points above the baseline FQ of 58.77, crossing the threshold for a positive trend. This is a consistent, low-volatility improvement rather than a sharp spike — stable progress, not a hot streak.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Ionuț Andrei Radu

Nearly identical FQ score (58.61 vs 58.77) places both in the same adequate-starter band; Radu has operated across multiple leagues which adds contextual variance this player's single-league Bundesliga sample does not reflect.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

6 metrics surfaced
Appearances
33
Minutes
2970
Key passes
1
Rating
6.87
Successful dribbles
1
Clean sheets
6
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2970 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Save load
107 saves suggest a significant shot-stopping workload in current coverage.
Previous
TQ 65.2Form 65.0
Current
TQ 67.2Form 67.3
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
—
Key Passes
0.03
Tackles
—
Rating
6.88
Lukáš Hradecký

Comparable FQ score (58.12) suggests similar overall output level, though Hradecký carries a longer top-flight track record that gives his score more historical weight.

Compare →
José Pedro Malheiro de Sá

Marginally higher FQ (60.52) makes Sá the ceiling benchmark in this peer group — the 1.75-point gap is small but consistent with slightly better underlying metrics in the same scoring tier.

Compare →
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Goalkeeper-specific output

No save rate, save percentage, or xG-prevention data is available. For a goalkeeper, these are the primary value drivers — their absence means the 58.77 FQ score cannot be validated upward, and no shot-stopping quality can be confirmed beyond the mid-range baseline.

Creative/distribution contribution

Key passes sit at just 0.03 per 90, indicating minimal involvement in build-up play — a relevant gap in the modern Bundesliga, where goalkeepers are increasingly expected to contribute to possession phases.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →