Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A La Liga goalkeeper sitting at 58.61 on the FQ scale — squarely in the adequate-starter band, where competent positional work is evident but no elite-level output separates them from the pack. With 2,970 minutes across 33 matches this season, the sample is substantial and the 0.91 confidence score makes this reading reliable. The most distinctive feature of this profile is not the baseline, but the gap between it and current form.
The FQ score of 58.61 reflects a goalkeeper who meets positional baseline requirements without exceeding them — no sub-score data points to a standout dimension that would push them into the 65+ range. The absence of role-specific defensive metrics (save percentage, goals prevented above expected) in the available data limits deeper resolution, but the overall signal at 0.91 confidence is stable and clear.
Form is on a clear upward trajectory: the form score of 67.27 sits 8.7 points above the multi-season FQ score of 58.61, the largest meaningful signal in this profile. If recent performances sustain, a re-rating toward the 63–67 range is plausible, though the long-term baseline will anchor the FQ score until the trend holds across more matches.
Nearly identical FQ score (58.12) places Hradecký in the same adequate-starter band, though Hradecký's profile is built on a longer top-league track record rather than a single-season sample.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
A close FQ match at 60.52, suggesting similar overall output levels; de Sá edges ahead marginally, likely reflecting slightly stronger role-specific metrics in the available data.
Rønnow's 60.77 FQ score is the ceiling of this comparable group — the gap to this player is narrow (2.2 points) but consistent, pointing to a modest but real difference in baseline production.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →