Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga goalkeeper sitting at 62.8 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, but without standout markers that separate them from the positional baseline. Across 31 matches (2,790 minutes), the profile is defined by consistency rather than elite output, with no sub-score clearing the 70 threshold. The 0.91 score confidence means this read is reliable.
The FQ score of 62.8 reflects a goalkeeper who meets positional baseline without exceeding it. All goalkeeper-specific sub-scores are null in the dataset, meaning the score is driven by aggregate output signals rather than granular shot-stopping or distribution metrics — a ceiling on how high this profile can be rated with current data.
Form score of 61.38 sits 1.4 points below the FQ score of 62.8 — within the ±5 stable band, indicating no meaningful directional shift. This is consistent, flat performance with no upward momentum.
Areola's FQ score of 62.77 is virtually identical, making him the closest statistical peer; the key difference is Areola operates as a backup at a Champions League club, while this player's Bundesliga context suggests a more active starting role.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Vicario scores marginally higher at 63.36, reflecting a similar adequate-starter profile; Vicario's higher-pressure Premier League environment distinguishes the competitive context.
Donnarumma's 63.9 FQ score places him in the same narrow band despite his significantly higher-profile status, suggesting current output metrics are converging at this tier regardless of reputation.
All role-specific sub-scores (defense, shot-stopping, distribution) return null. This limits assessment to aggregate signals only — save percentage, clean sheet rate, and cross-claiming data are not available, making it impossible to identify specific technical strengths or weaknesses within the position.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →