TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Guglielmo Vicario 

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Tottenham Hotspur
Position
Goalkeeper
Date of Birth
Oct 7, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#1
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Guglielmo Vicario 
Guglielmo Vicario 
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Tottenham Hotspur
Position
Goalkeeper
Date of Birth
Oct 7, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#1
TactiQ Score
69.0
90% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
69.0
Form Score
63.7
Confidence
90%
Role
goalkeeper
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
—
Key Pass
0.03
Tackles
0.03
Rating
6.70
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A Premier League goalkeeper sitting at 63.36 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, but without the elite shot-stopping or distribution qualities that push top-flight keepers into the 70s. Across 31 matches (2,790 minutes) this season, output has been consistent and predictable, with a match rating of 6.7 per 90. The most distinctive feature here is stability: this is a goalkeeper who reliably meets positional baseline requirements without meaningfully exceeding them.

Why this score

With all goalkeeper-specific defensive sub-scores returning null, the FQ score of 63.36 is driven primarily by overall performance consistency and positional baseline compliance rather than any standout metric. The absence of granular shot-stopping data — save percentage, clean sheets, distribution accuracy — means the score reflects competent adequacy rather than a verified ceiling or floor.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 63.23 sits just -0.13 below the FQ score of 63.36 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful trend in either direction; output this season has tracked the multi-season average almost exactly.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Gianluigi Donnarumma

Donnarumma scores 63.9 — nearly identical to this player — placing both in the same adequate-starter band; the key difference is Donnarumma's profile carries higher name recognition and a stronger historical ceiling that his current score does not fully reflect.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

6 metrics surfaced
Appearances
31
Minutes
2790
Key passes
1
Rating
6.70
Tackles
1
Clean sheets
7
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2790 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Save load
83 saves suggest a significant shot-stopping workload in current coverage.
Strengths
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 74.0Form 74.3
Previous
TQ 66.1Form 66.1
Current
TQ 63.7Form 63.7
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
—
Key Passes
0.03
Tackles
0.03
Rating
6.70
Alphonse Areola

Areola's 62.77 FQ score makes him the closest numerical match, with both keepers occupying a backup-to-mid-table-starter role in a top league; Areola's limited minutes context distinguishes his sample from this player's full 2,790-minute season.

Compare →
Gerónimo Rulli

Rulli's 64.35 sits just above this player, representing the same mid-tier goalkeeper band; Rulli has shown slightly more volatility in form across comparable periods, whereas this player's near-zero form delta signals greater consistency.

Compare →
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Shot-stopping measurability

All role-specific defensive sub-scores are null, meaning save quality, clean sheet contribution, and distribution cannot be quantified. For a Premier League goalkeeper, this is the primary production dimension — its absence limits how far this score can move in either direction.

Attacking contribution

Key passes of 0.03 per 90 and tackles of 0.03 per 90 are at the floor of what is recorded, consistent with a goalkeeper who does not meaningfully influence play beyond the defensive line.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →