Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Ligue 1 goalkeeper sitting at 63.15 on the FQ scale — solidly in the "adequate starter" band, where competitive top-flight keepers without standout qualities tend to cluster. Across 19 matches (1,710 minutes), output has been consistent but unremarkable, with an average match rating of 6.87. No sub-score dimension clears the 70 threshold, which defines this player's ceiling at this stage of the data.
The FQ score of 63.15 is driven primarily by stable, baseline-level performance without any elite sub-score anchor to push it higher. Goalkeeper-specific metrics — save percentage, goals prevented, distribution — are not captured in the current dataset, which limits upward differentiation and keeps the score in the adequate range.
Form score of 60.98 sits 2.17 points below the FQ score of 63.15 — within the ±5 stable band, but trending marginally softer. No alarm signals, though the direction is slightly downward rather than flat.
Vicario's FQ score of 63.36 is nearly identical, placing both keepers in the same adequate-starter band; Vicario operates in a higher-profile league context which may inflate his visibility relative to this player's Ligue 1 setting.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Areola's 62.77 FQ score reflects a comparable level of consistent but non-elite output; the key difference is Areola's longer top-flight track record, which provides greater historical sample confidence.
Donnarumma's 63.9 FQ score is the closest ceiling in this comparable set, sharing the same mid-tier band; however, Donnarumma's pedigree and prior peak seasons suggest his current score reflects a trough rather than a ceiling, unlike this player where 63 may represent a true baseline.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →