Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A defensive midfielder sitting at 52.37 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band (50-59) with 29 appearances and 1,653 minutes this season. The most distinctive feature of this profile is not what the data shows, but what it cannot: all role-critical sub-scores (defense, progression, creation) are null, meaning the 52.37 score is built on surface-level signal rather than validated positional output. At this score level, the player meets a minimum baseline but offers no standout dimension.
The FQ score of 52.37 is anchored by a high data confidence of 0.81 and a reasonable sample size, but is constrained by the complete absence of sub-scores across all measured dimensions. Without defense, progression, or creation scores to validate role-specific contributions, the model defaults to a median read — the score reflects adequacy by absence of evidence rather than confirmed multi-dimensional output.
Form score of 46.32 is 6.05 points below the FQ score of 52.37, a gap that signals a soft but meaningful decline rather than a stable plateau. This downward drift, combined with null sub-scores that prevent volatility analysis, makes the near-term outlook difficult to assess with confidence.
Henderson's FQ score of 51.48 sits within one point of this player's 52.37, reflecting a similar median-band profile for a defensive midfielder; Henderson's profile, however, carries more established league context and visible sub-score history.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Kamara's 53.46 FQ score makes him a close positional and output peer, both operating in the typical performer band; Kamara's profile typically carries stronger defensive sub-score visibility, which this player currently lacks.
Gueye's 53.77 FQ score is the closest ceiling comparable, with both players profiling as functional rather than creative defensive midfielders; Gueye's profile generally shows more validated defensive action data than is available here.
For a defensive midfielder, tackles and defensive actions are the primary value driver — yet the defense sub-score is null. The available per-90 data shows 1.58 tackles per 90, but without a validated defense sub-score, it is impossible to confirm whether this meets the positional baseline in Serie A.
Both progression and creation sub-scores are null. Key passes sit at 0.87 per 90, which is a thin creative footprint for a player in this role, but cannot be contextualised against positional norms without a sub-score anchor.
Form score of 46.32 sits 6.05 points below the FQ score of 52.37, indicating a soft decline in recent output. This places the trajectory in the declining band and suggests current performance is running below the player's own historical average.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →