TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Jordan Henderson

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Brentford
Position
Defensive Midfield
Also: Defensive Midfielder
Date of Birth
Jun 17, 1990 (35)
Jersey Number
#6
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Jordan Henderson
Jordan Henderson
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Brentford
Position
Defensive Midfield
Also: Defensive Midfielder
Date of Birth
Jun 17, 1990 (35)
Jersey Number
#6
TactiQ Score
68.7
88% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
68.7
Form Score
63.5
Confidence
88%
Role
defensive_midfielder
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.05
Assists
0.15
Key Pass
0.88
Tackles
1.28
Rating
6.71
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A fringe-level defensive midfielder in the Premier League sitting at 51.48 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band. Across 29 matches and 1,823 minutes this season, output is modest: 1.28 tackles per 90 and a 6.72 average match rating that does not clear the bar for a reliable starter in this role. The absence of granular sub-scores limits deeper diagnosis, but the headline numbers point to a player not yet meeting positional standards in England's top flight.

Why this score

With an FQ score of 51.48 and no sub-score above threshold — in fact all sub-scores are null, preventing component-level breakdown — the score is driven by modest per-90 output: 1.28 tackles, 0.89 key passes, and 0.05 goals per 90 collectively fall short of what a Premier League defensive midfielder is expected to produce. The overall picture is one of below-baseline contribution across the board rather than a single identifiable weakness.

Form Trajectory

Form is in soft decline: the form score of 45.87 sits 5.61 points below the FQ score of 51.48, crossing the threshold for a meaningful downward trend. With high score confidence (0.85), this gap reflects genuine recent deterioration rather than measurement noise and warrants monitoring over the next fixture cycle.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
João Maria Lobo Alves Palhinha Gonçalves

Both occupy the defensive midfielder role at a similar FQ level (50.64 vs 51.48), reflecting comparable overall output; Palhinha is typically associated with higher tackle volume and physical dueling, which may represent a ceiling this player has not yet reached.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
30
Minutes
1834
Goals
1
Assists
3
Key passes
18
Rating
6.71
Tackles
26
Shots on target
1
Successful dribbles
3
Clean sheets
7
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 73.7Form 74.1
Previous
TQ 69.8Form 70.2
Current
TQ 63.1Form 63.5
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.05
Assists
0.15
Key Passes
0.88
Tackles
1.28
Rating
6.71
Ibrahim Sangaré

Sangaré's FQ score of 50.51 places him in the same typical-performer band, making him a close positional peer; Sangaré's profile tends toward greater physical presence, whereas this player's 0.89 key passes per 90 hints at a marginally more technical orientation.

Compare →
Tyler Adams

Adams scores 50.30, nearly identical on the FQ scale, and shares the defensive midfielder role; Adams is noted for high-energy pressing and positional discipline, areas where this player's current form decline (45.87 form score) suggests he is currently underperforming relative to that benchmark.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
1834 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
26 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

1.28 tackles per 90 is the primary defensive action on record, but without a defense sub-score it cannot be benchmarked precisely — what is visible is that it has not translated into an FQ score above 51, suggesting volume or success rate is insufficient for this role in the Premier League.

Ball progression & creation

0.89 key passes per 90 and 0.15 assists per 90 are the only creation signals available. For a defensive midfielder, these numbers are not disqualifying, but combined with a sub-50 performance agent score they indicate the player is not compensating for defensive gaps with meaningful attacking contribution.

Consistency

All component sub-scores are null, meaning no dimension has been measured above a scoreable threshold — this data gap itself reflects limited standout contribution across finishing, creation, progression, defense, possession control, and physical duels.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →