Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A La Liga central midfielder sitting at 63.42 on the FQ scale — solidly in the adequate-starter band, with no dimension pulling them meaningfully above or below that level. The most distinctive feature of this profile is its uniformity: 31 appearances and 2,566 minutes this season with a 7.34 average rating, yet no sub-score breaks above the baseline threshold. At 0.28 assists and 1.51 key passes per 90, creative output is present but not a differentiator; 1.47 tackles per 90 suggests reasonable two-way engagement for the role.
With all six dimension sub-scores returning null, the FQ score of 63.42 is driven entirely by aggregate per-90 production and rating data rather than any standout dimensional strength. No single area elevates or suppresses the score — the result is a profile that lands precisely where its raw output numbers suggest: functional, consistent, unremarkable.
Form score of 63.71 sits just 0.29 points above the FQ score of 63.42 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum; this player is performing almost exactly in line with their established baseline.
Amiri's FQ score of 63.39 is virtually identical, reflecting a similar profile of consistent mid-range central midfield output; the key difference is Amiri's documented presence in a different league context, which may shape how that production is weighted.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Modrić's current FQ score of 62.65 places him in the same band, making for a striking contextual comparison — both occupy the adequate-starter range, though Modrić's profile reflects age-related decline from a historically elite baseline rather than a developmental ceiling.
Anderson's 64.21 FQ score is the closest ceiling comparison in this group, sitting marginally above; both players share a similar per-90 contribution profile for central midfield, though Anderson's slightly higher score suggests a modest edge in at least one measurable output area.
All six sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense, possession control, physical duel) are null. For a central midfielder — a role where creation and progression are primary outputs — this prevents any assessment of where within the position this player actually operates or excels. The per-90 numbers (1.51 key passes, 0.18 goals, 0.28 assists) suggest a mid-range contributor, but role specificity cannot be confirmed.
0.18 goals and 0.28 assists per 90 combine for a 0.46 goal-involvement rate — adequate for a central midfielder but below the threshold expected of a box-to-box or advanced 8. This limits upside in any system requiring direct attacking returns from midfield.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →