TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Péter Gulácsi

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
RB Leipzig
Position
Goalkeeper
Date of Birth
May 6, 1990 (36)
Jersey Number
#1
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Péter Gulácsi
Péter Gulácsi
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
RB Leipzig
Position
Goalkeeper
Date of Birth
May 6, 1990 (36)
Jersey Number
#1
TactiQ Score
71.7
76% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
71.7
Form Score
65.7
Confidence
76%
Role
goalkeeper
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
—
Key Pass
—
Tackles
0.05
Rating
6.87
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A Bundesliga goalkeeper sitting at 64.72 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, comfortably fulfilling positional expectations without pushing into the above-average bracket. Across 22 matches and 1,919 minutes this season, the profile is one of steady, unremarkable reliability: a 6.87 average match rating and just 0.05 tackles per 90 reflect a goalkeeper who is present but not dominant. No sub-score clears the 70 threshold, which is the honest story here.

Why this score

The FQ score of 64.72 is anchored by a consistent but unspectacular baseline — no individual sub-score stands out to pull the rating higher, and the absence of a recorded defense sub-score means shot-stopping quality and clean-sheet contribution cannot be directly quantified. What is visible points to a mid-tier performer rather than a clear standout.

Form Trajectory

Form is in a mild downward trend: the form score of 60.53 sits 4.19 points below the FQ score of 64.72, which falls just inside the stable-to-soft-decline boundary. Not a sharp deterioration, but recent performances are running below the player's own historical baseline and warrant monitoring.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Gerónimo Rulli

Rulli's FQ score of 64.35 is nearly identical, placing both goalkeepers in the same adequate-starter band; the key difference is league context, with Rulli's score earned in a different competitive environment.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

5 metrics surfaced
Appearances
22
Minutes
1919
Rating
6.87
Tackles
1
Clean sheets
9
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
1919 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive outcomes
9 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Save load
52 saves suggest a significant shot-stopping workload in current coverage.
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 74.2Form 74.2
Previous
TQ 77.6Form 77.6
Current
TQ 66.0Form 65.7
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
—
Key Passes
—
Tackles
0.05
Rating
6.87
Gianluigi Donnarumma

Donnarumma's FQ score of 63.90 puts him in the same tier despite a significantly higher-profile career trajectory, suggesting current output rather than reputation is what the model is capturing.

Compare →
Guglielmo Vicario

Vicario's 63.36 FQ score reflects a similar mid-60s ceiling; both profiles share the characteristic of reliable positional coverage without elite differentiators in the available data.

Compare →
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Shot-stopping data gap

The defense sub-score is null, meaning save percentage, clean-sheet rate, and shot-stopping efficiency cannot be assessed from available data. For a goalkeeper, this is the single most important dimension — its absence limits confidence in the overall picture despite a solid 76% score confidence overall.

Match rating ceiling

A 6.87 average match rating across 22 appearances sits in the functional-but-unremarkable range. It reflects consistent participation without the high-impact performances that would push a goalkeeper toward the 70+ FQ bracket.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →