TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Iñigo Ruiz de Galarreta

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Athletic Club
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Aug 6, 1993 (32)
Jersey Number
#16
League
La Liga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Iñigo Ruiz de Galarreta
Iñigo Ruiz de Galarreta
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Athletic Club
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Aug 6, 1993 (32)
Jersey Number
#16
TactiQ Score
69.1
90% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
69.1
Form Score
63.8
Confidence
90%
Role
central_midfielder
League
La Liga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.04
Assists
0.09
Key Pass
1.07
Tackles
2.59
Rating
6.83
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A central midfielder in La Liga sitting at 52.75 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range, where basic positional duties are met but no dimension stands out. Across 30 matches and 1,972 minutes this season, the most visible output is 2.51 tackles per 90 and 1.1 key passes per 90, with goal and assist contributions minimal at 0.05 and 0.09 per 90 respectively. High data confidence (0.87) means this reading is reliable — this is a functional but unexceptional profile.

Why this score

The FQ score of 52.75 reflects a player who covers ground defensively and circulates the ball adequately, but whose attacking output — 0.05 goals and 0.09 assists per 90 — falls well short of what separates good central midfielders from typical ones. The absence of granular sub-scores (all null) prevents pinpointing a single dimension as the ceiling, but the per-90 numbers collectively paint a picture of limited production.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 50.25 sits 2.5 points below the FQ score of 52.75 — within the ±5 stable band, so this is not a meaningful concern, but the direction is mildly negative rather than flat. No sharp deterioration is evident.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Daniel Parejo Muñoz

Parejo's FQ score of 52.26 places him at near-identical overall output; the key difference is Parejo's profile is historically weighted toward distribution and set-piece delivery, whereas this player's 2.51 tackles per 90 suggests a more defensive-leaning midfield role.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
31
Minutes
2016
Goals
1
Assists
2
Key passes
24
Rating
6.83
Tackles
58
Shots on target
2
Successful dribbles
32
Clean sheets
5
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 65.5Form 65.1
Previous
TQ 66.9Form 66.8
Current
TQ 64.0Form 63.8
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.04
Assists
0.09
Key Passes
1.07
Tackles
2.59
Rating
6.83
Henrikh Mkhitaryan

Mkhitaryan's 51.78 FQ score reflects a similarly mid-range overall standing, though his profile typically skews toward creative output in advanced areas — a contrast to this player's lower 0.09 assists per 90.

Compare →
Jean-Ricner Bellegarde

Bellegarde's 51.33 FQ score sits in the same typical-performer band; both share limited attacking returns, though Bellegarde's profile tends to emphasise ball-carrying progression over the defensive volume seen here.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2016 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
58 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Attacking output

0.05 goals and 0.09 assists per 90 are low for a central midfielder expected to contribute to chance creation and scoring; 1.1 key passes per 90 is functional but not a differentiator at this level.

Defensive engagement

2.51 tackles per 90 suggests active defensive involvement, but without a defense sub-score to contextualise success rate or positioning, it is unclear whether this volume translates to genuine defensive value.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →