Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A striker sitting at 64.88 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, with consistent positional output but no elite dimension to separate him from the pack. His 0.61 goals per 90 and 1.27 key passes per 90 reflect a striker who contributes across multiple phases, though the absence of granular sub-scores limits a full efficiency read. At 64.88, clear gaps exist that prevent him from registering as a standout even within a mid-tier league context.
With all sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense, possession control, physical duel) returning null, the FQ score of 64.88 is driven entirely by aggregate per-90 production metrics — goals, assists, key passes, and rating — which collectively land him in the adequate-starter band without any single dimension pulling the score higher.
Form is on a clear upward trajectory: the form score of 70.3 sits 5.4 points above the baseline FQ score of 64.88, crossing the threshold for a meaningful improving signal. However, with all sub-scores null, it is not possible to determine whether this uptick is broad-based across dimensions or concentrated in one area, introducing some uncertainty about how durable the improvement is.
Mateta's FQ score of 63.67 sits just 1.2 points below this player, reflecting a similar profile of functional striker output in a competitive league context; the key difference is Mateta operates in the Premier League, where the same production level carries a higher environmental difficulty premium.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Griezmann's 66.16 FQ score is the closest ceiling comparable, with both players contributing across goals and key passes rather than being pure finishers; Griezmann's creation profile is more established, whereas this player's multi-phase contribution is harder to verify without sub-scores.
Aspas Juncal at 66.39 represents a slight step above in overall scoring, with a similarly versatile striker profile; the gap likely reflects more consistent efficiency metrics that this player has not yet confirmed given the null sub-score profile.
0.61 goals per 90 is a functional rate for a Serie A striker, but without a finishing sub-score to assess shot quality or conversion percentage, there is no evidence this output is driven by efficiency rather than volume. The gap to elite finishing territory (85+ sub-score) is likely meaningful.
1.27 key passes per 90 is an above-baseline figure for a striker, but the null creation sub-score means the quality and danger of those passes cannot be confirmed — the raw count may overstate actual creative impact.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →