Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A central midfielder in Serie A sitting at 52.97 on the FQ scale — a typical performer by the platform's calibration, meaning adequate positional output without standout production in any measurable dimension. Across 31 matches and 1,861 minutes this season, the most visible per-90 numbers are 1.35 key passes and 1.35 tackles, suggesting a balanced but unspectacular two-way profile. No sub-score clears the 70 threshold required to identify a genuine strength area.
The FQ score of 52.97 is driven primarily by the absence of any elite dimension — all role-specific sub-scores (creation, progression, defense, possession control, physical duel) are unavailable, and the per-90 outputs (0.29 goals, 0.10 assists) sit at or below what would be expected of a standout central midfielder in Serie A. The score reflects functional adequacy rather than any identifiable area of above-average contribution.
Form score of 53.83 sits just 0.86 points above the FQ score of 52.97 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend; this player is producing at a consistent, flat level with no signal of acceleration or decline.
Parejo's FQ score of 52.26 places him in the same typical-performer band; both share a central midfield profile at this score level, though Parejo is historically associated with higher passing volume and set-piece delivery that this player's data does not yet reflect.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Mkhitaryan's 51.78 FQ score reflects a similar output tier in Serie A central midfield, making him a close positional and performance-level reference; the key difference is Mkhitaryan's established creative pedigree, which is not yet evidenced in this player's available metrics.
Bellegarde's 51.33 FQ score sits just below this player's 52.97, representing a near-identical performance band; Bellegarde tends to offer more progressive carrying, a dimension that cannot be confirmed or denied here due to null sub-scores.
0.29 goals and 0.10 assists per 90 are modest for a central midfielder expected to contribute to the final third — combined, that is under 0.4 direct goal involvements per 90, which falls short of what separates impactful midfielders from functional ones in Serie A.
1.35 key passes per 90 is a workable but unremarkable creation rate for the role; without a creation sub-score to contextualise it against positional peers, it reads as mid-range output rather than a differentiating quality.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →