TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Piotr Zieliński

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Inter
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
May 20, 1994 (31)
Jersey Number
#7
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Piotr Zieliński
Piotr Zieliński
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Inter
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
May 20, 1994 (31)
Jersey Number
#7
TactiQ Score
69.4
90% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
69.4
Form Score
67.1
Confidence
90%
Role
central_midfielder
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.28
Assists
0.14
Key Pass
1.40
Tackles
1.35
Rating
7.04
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A central midfielder in Serie A sitting at 52.97 on the FQ scale — a typical performer by the platform's calibration, meaning adequate positional output without standout production in any measurable dimension. Across 31 matches and 1,861 minutes this season, the most visible per-90 numbers are 1.35 key passes and 1.35 tackles, suggesting a balanced but unspectacular two-way profile. No sub-score clears the 70 threshold required to identify a genuine strength area.

Why this score

The FQ score of 52.97 is driven primarily by the absence of any elite dimension — all role-specific sub-scores (creation, progression, defense, possession control, physical duel) are unavailable, and the per-90 outputs (0.29 goals, 0.10 assists) sit at or below what would be expected of a standout central midfielder in Serie A. The score reflects functional adequacy rather than any identifiable area of above-average contribution.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 53.83 sits just 0.86 points above the FQ score of 52.97 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend; this player is producing at a consistent, flat level with no signal of acceleration or decline.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Daniel Parejo Muñoz

Parejo's FQ score of 52.26 places him in the same typical-performer band; both share a central midfield profile at this score level, though Parejo is historically associated with higher passing volume and set-piece delivery that this player's data does not yet reflect.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
32
Minutes
1928
Goals
6
Assists
3
Key passes
30
Rating
7.04
Tackles
29
Shots on target
10
Successful dribbles
17
Clean sheets
16
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 68.3Form 67.9
Previous
TQ 64.0Form 63.9
Current
TQ 67.3Form 67.1
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.28
Assists
0.14
Key Passes
1.40
Tackles
1.35
Rating
7.04
Henrikh Mkhitaryan

Mkhitaryan's 51.78 FQ score reflects a similar output tier in Serie A central midfield, making him a close positional and performance-level reference; the key difference is Mkhitaryan's established creative pedigree, which is not yet evidenced in this player's available metrics.

Compare →
Jean-Ricner Bellegarde

Bellegarde's 51.33 FQ score sits just below this player's 52.97, representing a near-identical performance band; Bellegarde tends to offer more progressive carrying, a dimension that cannot be confirmed or denied here due to null sub-scores.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
1928 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
29 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
16 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Goal and assist output

0.29 goals and 0.10 assists per 90 are modest for a central midfielder expected to contribute to the final third — combined, that is under 0.4 direct goal involvements per 90, which falls short of what separates impactful midfielders from functional ones in Serie A.

Creative production

1.35 key passes per 90 is a workable but unremarkable creation rate for the role; without a creation sub-score to contextualise it against positional peers, it reads as mid-range output rather than a differentiating quality.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →