Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A fringe-level center back in Ligue 1 with an FQ Score of 47.38, placing him in the bottom half of all scored players — well below the threshold expected of a reliable top-flight starter. Across 26 matches and 2,130 minutes this season, his per-90 output is thin: 1.56 tackles, 0.17 key passes, and a 6.93 average rating. The absence of granular sub-score data limits full positional assessment, but the overall picture is of a player with limited impact at this level.
The FQ Score of 47.38 is driven primarily by below-baseline overall output for a center back role, where defensive solidity and consistency are the core value drivers. All role-specific sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) are null, meaning the score rests on surface-level metrics that paint a picture of low-volume, low-impact contribution.
Form score of 44.17 sits 3.21 points below the FQ Score of 47.38, placing this player in stable-to-soft decline territory — not an acute drop, but no upward signal either. The decline is consistent rather than episodic, suggesting this is a baseline performance level rather than a temporary dip.
Nearly identical FQ Score (47.13 vs 47.38) places both players in the same fringe-starter band; Torres provides a like-for-like benchmark at this scoring tier.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
A close FQ Score match at 46.79 makes Smith a useful peer comparison, though contextual league and role differences may account for subtle output variation.
Keane's FQ Score of 46.28 reflects a similar overall contribution ceiling; as a more established name, he illustrates that this score band can include experienced players whose output has plateaued rather than developing ones.
1.56 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive volume signal, and without duel success rates, interception counts, or clearance data, it is impossible to confirm even baseline defensive reliability — a critical gap for evaluating a center back.
0.04 goals and 0.04 assists per 90, alongside 0.17 key passes per 90, represent minimal output in any phase of play — well below what modern center backs in top leagues are expected to contribute in build-up or set-piece situations.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →