TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Franck Honorat

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Borussia Mönchengladbach
Position
Right Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
Aug 11, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#9
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Franck Honorat
Franck Honorat
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Borussia Mönchengladbach
Position
Right Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
Aug 11, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#9
TactiQ Score
70.2
87% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
70.2
Form Score
62.3
Confidence
87%
Role
winger
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.09
Assists
0.27
Key Pass
2.06
Tackles
1.01
Rating
6.86
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A mid-range Bundesliga winger sitting at an FQ Score of 57.11 — adequate starter territory, but without standout production in any single dimension. Across 25 matches and 1,829 minutes this season, the per-90 output tells the story: 0.1 goals and 0.3 assists per 90 are below what elite wingers produce, though 2.07 key passes per 90 provides some creative presence. With all sub-scores returning null, the aggregate picture is one of functional contribution without a defining strength.

Why this score

The FQ Score of 57.11 is driven by moderate aggregate output — 0.1 goals and 0.3 assists per 90 are below the threshold expected of impactful wingers, and the absence of any sub-score above 70 means there is no single dimension pulling the overall rating higher. The null sub-score profile prevents pinpointing a specific ceiling, but the per-90 numbers confirm production is present without being decisive.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 52.38 sits 4.73 points below the FQ Score of 57.11 — within the ±5 stable band, but nudging toward soft decline territory. Recent output is running slightly below the season baseline, suggesting a mild dip rather than a structural drop-off.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Alex Iwobi

Iwobi's FQ Score of 57.64 is nearly identical, reflecting a similar profile of consistent but non-elite winger output; Iwobi tends to operate in a more central, ball-retention role rather than as a wide threat.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
27
Minutes
1965
Goals
2
Assists
6
Key passes
45
Rating
6.86
Tackles
22
Shots on target
6
Successful dribbles
18
Clean sheets
10
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 70.3Form 69.9
Previous
TQ 70.7Form 70.5
Current
TQ 62.6Form 62.3
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.09
Assists
0.27
Key Passes
2.06
Tackles
1.01
Rating
6.86
Jack Grealish

Grealish scores 58.16 — marginally higher — and shares the pattern of high key-pass volume without translating it into elite goal involvement; Grealish's dribbling profile is more pronounced.

Compare →
Harvey Lewis Barnes

Barnes at 55.7 is the closest lower bound, similarly sitting in adequate-starter range; Barnes carries more direct goal threat but with comparable overall impact ceilings.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
1965 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
22 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
10 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Goal involvement

0.1 goals and 0.3 assists per 90 combine for just 0.4 direct goal contributions per 90 — low for a winger role where attacking output is the primary expectation.

Defensive contribution

0.93 tackles per 90 is a modest defensive return; for a winger in the Bundesliga, this sits at the lower end of what pressing-intensive systems typically demand.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →