Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A fringe-level defensive midfielder in Ligue 1 with an FQ Score of 49.84 — sitting in the typical performer band and below the threshold for a consistent starter. Across 25 matches and 2,079 minutes this season, output is limited: 1.52 tackles per 90 and a 6.81 average rating are the clearest production signals available. All role-specific sub-scores (defense, progression, creation) are null, meaning the full picture cannot be drawn from available data alone.
The FQ Score of 49.84 is driven primarily by below-baseline aggregate production for a defensive midfielder — a position where defensive actions, duels, and progressive passing are the core currency. With all dimensional sub-scores returning null, the score reflects a thin contribution profile rather than any single catastrophic weakness.
Form is in soft-to-meaningful decline: the form score of 43.26 sits 6.6 points below the FQ Score of 49.84, confirming recent output has deteriorated relative to the seasonal baseline. With a score confidence of 0.83 and 25 matches played, this is a reliable signal rather than a small-sample fluctuation.
Adams sits at a near-identical FQ Score of 50.3 in the same positional band, making him a close aggregate peer; Adams, however, operates in a higher-profile league context which may suppress his score relative to underlying quality.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Sangaré's FQ Score of 50.51 places him in the same typical-performer tier for defensive midfielders; Sangaré tends to profile as a more physically dominant ball-winner, a dimension that cannot be confirmed or denied here due to null sub-scores.
Lobotka's FQ Score of 49.15 is the closest numerical match in this comparable set; Lobotka is a distinctly possession-oriented profile, which likely represents a different stylistic archetype despite the similar aggregate score.
1.52 tackles per 90 is the primary defensive signal available, but without interception, duel, or defensive sub-score data, it is impossible to confirm whether this meets positional baseline — and the overall FQ Score of 49.84 suggests it does not.
0.04 goals per 90 and 0.65 key passes per 90 are minimal for any role, including a defensive midfielder where creation is secondary — these figures offer no compensating value to offset the defensive profile gaps.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →