Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Ligue 1 goalkeeper sitting at 65.51 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, meeting baseline expectations for regular first-team football but without the sub-score evidence to identify elite attributes. Across 30 matches and 2,700 minutes this season, performance has been consistent rather than standout, with a rating of 6.84 per 90. The 0.91 confidence score means this read is built on solid ground.
The FQ score of 65.51 reflects a goalkeeper performing at a functional but unremarkable level, with no role-specific sub-scores (save percentage, xG prevented, distribution) available to push the rating higher or lower. Without those goalkeeper-specific dimensions, the score is anchored by aggregate performance data alone, which places this player squarely in the adequate-starter band.
Form score of 63.76 sits 1.75 points below the FQ score of 65.51 — within the ±5 stable range, so this is a flat trajectory rather than a meaningful decline. No volatility concern is warranted at this delta.
Gazzaniga's FQ score of 66.21 places him in the same adequate-starter band, making him a close positional peer; the 0.70-point gap suggests Gazzaniga edges this player marginally in aggregate output.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Dúbravka scores 66.27, nearly identical in overall standing, though his profile is built in a different league context which may reflect a higher baseline difficulty of competition.
Rulli's FQ score of 64.35 is the closest below this player's 65.51, reflecting a similar performance tier; Rulli's Ligue 1 experience makes him the most directly comparable environmental match.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →