TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Benjamin André

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
LOSC Lille
Position
Defensive Midfield
Also: Defensive Midfielder
Date of Birth
Aug 3, 1990 (35)
Jersey Number
#21
League
Ligue 1
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Benjamin André
Benjamin André
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
LOSC Lille
Position
Defensive Midfield
Also: Defensive Midfielder
Date of Birth
Aug 3, 1990 (35)
Jersey Number
#21
TactiQ Score
74.8
88% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
74.8
Form Score
69.6
Confidence
88%
Role
defensive_midfielder
League
Ligue 1
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.08
Assists
0.08
Key Pass
0.96
Tackles
2.55
Rating
7.19
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Ligue 1 defensive midfielder sitting at 55.51 on the FQ scale — a typical mid-tier performer for the position, with no sub-score dimension breaking above the baseline threshold. Across 24 matches and 2,064 minutes this season, the most visible output is 2.53 tackles per 90, which anchors the profile as a volume defensive contributor. The absence of granular sub-scores limits how precisely this player can be placed within the position, but the overall signal is consistent: adequate, unremarkable, and stable.

Why this score

The FQ score of 55.51 reflects a player meeting positional baseline requirements without excelling in any measurable dimension — all sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) are null, so no single area drives the score upward. The 2.53 tackles per 90 is the clearest data point available and suggests defensive engagement, but without efficiency or volume context across other dimensions, the score cannot move higher.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 54.1 sits just 1.4 points below the FQ score of 55.51 — a delta well within the ±5 stable range. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend; this player is performing exactly in line with their established level.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Idrissa Gana Gueye

Both sit in the 53–56 FQ range as defensive midfielders with a similar profile of defensive volume over creative output; Gueye carries a higher-profile career pedigree that this player does not yet match.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
26
Minutes
2244
Goals
2
Assists
2
Key passes
23
Rating
7.17
Tackles
65
Shots on target
6
Successful dribbles
12
Clean sheets
13
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 71.6Form 72.2
Previous
TQ 73.4Form 73.7
Current
TQ 69.1Form 69.6
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.08
Assists
0.08
Key Passes
0.96
Tackles
2.55
Rating
7.19
Boubacar Kamara

Comparable FQ score (53.46) and positional role as a defensive midfielder; Kamara's profile is built on positional discipline and ball-winning, though he operates in a higher-profile tactical system.

Compare →
Rodrigo Hernández Cascante

The highest-scoring comparable at 59.12, sharing the defensive midfielder bucket; the 3.6-point FQ gap reflects a meaningfully higher output floor, particularly in progression and control dimensions.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2244 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
65 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
13 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Attacking contribution

0.09 goals and 0.09 assists per 90, with 1.00 key pass per 90 — all at the low end of what is expected even from a defensive midfielder. For a role that increasingly demands progressive passing or chance creation, these numbers offer little upside.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →