Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A fullback/wingback sitting at 52.63 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band — with 2,080 minutes across 27 matches this season providing a reliable read. The most notable on-ball output is 1.3 key passes per 90, which sits above what most defensive fullbacks produce, while 2.94 tackles per 90 reflects consistent defensive engagement. No sub-score breakdown is available, which limits how precisely strengths and weaknesses can be isolated.
With all role-specific sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) returning null, the FQ score of 52.63 is driven primarily by aggregate output metrics rather than dimensional quality. The 0.09 goals per 90 and a 6.87 average match rating anchor the score in the typical-performer range, with no single dimension pulling it meaningfully higher.
Form score of 56.19 sits 3.6 points above the FQ score of 52.63 — within the ±5 stable band, but nudging toward a modest upward trend. This suggests recent performances are slightly outpacing the season-long baseline, though not by a margin that signals a clear breakout.
Both sit within a narrow FQ band (Trippier at 52.87 vs. 52.63 here), reflecting functional fullback output at a similar level; Trippier's profile is historically more creation-heavy, which this player's 1.3 key passes per 90 partially mirrors but cannot be confirmed at the same volume without sub-scores.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Maitland-Niles (51.95) shares the typical-performer FQ range and a versatile fullback/wingback role bucket, though his profile carries more positional ambiguity than the clearer role definition seen here.
Dalot (53.63) is the closest FQ match in this comparable set and operates in a similar attacking fullback mold; the marginal gap of just 1 point suggests near-identical overall output levels, with Dalot's higher score likely reflecting stronger sub-score data availability.
All four role-specific sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) are null, meaning the FQ score cannot be decomposed into dimensional strengths. This limits confidence in identifying where the player is genuinely above or below positional baseline.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →