TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Eberechi Eze

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Arsenal
Position
Attacking Midfield
Also: Attacking Midfielder
Date of Birth
Jun 29, 1998 (27)
Jersey Number
#10
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Eberechi Eze
Eberechi Eze
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Arsenal
Position
Attacking Midfield
Also: Attacking Midfielder
Date of Birth
Jun 29, 1998 (27)
Jersey Number
#10
TactiQ Score
71.8
86% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
71.8
Form Score
65.5
Confidence
86%
Role
attacking_midfielder_creator
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.38
Assists
0.11
Key Pass
0.76
Tackles
0.92
Rating
6.98
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

An adequate starter in the Premier League's attacking midfielder/creator role, sitting at 66.06 on the FQ scale — a tier that signals consistent contribution without elite-level output. The most distinctive feature of this profile is a sharp recent form decline, with a form score of 53.37 pulling well below the established baseline. Sub-score granularity is absent, so the read is built on aggregate and per-90 data, but confidence in the overall figure is solid at 0.82.

Why this score

The 66.06 FQ score reflects adequate but not dominant attacking involvement — 0.4 goals and 0.11 assists per 90 are below the output thresholds that push creators into the 70+ range. Without creation or progression sub-scores to confirm quality of chance-making, the score leans on the aggregate signal, which places this player firmly in the 60–69 "adequate starter" band.

Form Trajectory

Form is in clear decline: the 53.37 form score sits 12.7 points below the 66.06 FQ score, crossing the threshold for a meaningful concern. This is the sharpest signal in the profile and warrants monitoring over the next 4–6 matches to determine whether this is a temporary dip or a structural shift.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Romano Schmid

Comparable FQ score (65.44 vs 66.06) reflects a similar tier of consistent but non-elite attacking midfield contribution; Schmid operates in a lower-profile league context, which may inflate his relative standing compared to this Premier League profile.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
30
Minutes
1729
Goals
7
Assists
2
Key passes
15
Rating
6.97
Tackles
17
Shots on target
15
Successful dribbles
26
Clean sheets
15
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 80.4Form 80.3
Previous
TQ 78.8Form 78.7
Current
TQ 65.7Form 65.5
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.38
Assists
0.11
Key Passes
0.76
Tackles
0.92
Rating
6.98
Julian Brandt

Brandt's 65.2 FQ score places him in the same adequate-starter band with a creator role profile; Brandt carries a stronger historical pedigree in top European football, suggesting this player's ceiling may be harder to project upward.

Compare →
Andrej Kramarić

Kramarić's 64.98 FQ score is the closest match numerically, though his profile skews more toward finishing than pure creation — the key distinction from this player's attacking midfielder/creator bucket.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive outcomes
15 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Goal and assist output

0.4 goals and 0.11 assists per 90 over 1,584 minutes this season. For an attacking midfielder/creator role in the Premier League, this combined direct output is below what separates adequate starters from above-average contributors — the FQ score reflects this ceiling.

Chance creation volume

0.8 key passes per 90 is a mid-range figure for a designated creator role. Without a creation sub-score to validate quality, this rate alone does not support an elite read and aligns with the 60–69 FQ band.

Recent form

Form score of 53.37 sits 12.69 points below the FQ score of 66.06 — a meaningful concern threshold. This drop suggests output over recent matches has fallen noticeably below the player's established level, whether through tactical, physical, or consistency factors.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →