Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A fringe-level center back in Serie A with an FQ Score of 47.91, placing them in the bottom half of the scoring scale — typical of a squad player or rotation option rather than a reliable starter. The most distinctive feature of this profile is what's missing: all role-specific sub-scores, including the defensive dimension that defines center back evaluation, are null, leaving the 1,816 minutes played this season without a granular quality breakdown. At 0.80 confidence across 24 matches, the sample is adequate, but the picture it paints is one of below-baseline output.
The FQ Score of 47.91 is driven primarily by below-baseline overall performance in the 44–48 range, with no defensive sub-score available to identify any redeeming strength in the core center back dimension. The per-90 data — 1.54 tackles, 0.20 key passes, a 6.86 match rating — reflects a player contributing at a modest, unremarkable level without standout output in any measurable category.
Form score (46.99) sits 0.92 points below the FQ Score (47.91), a delta within the ±5 stable range — trajectory is flat rather than deteriorating. There is no meaningful upward momentum, but equally no sign of acute collapse; this player is performing at a consistently modest level.
Closest comparable at FQ 48.49, reflecting a similarly fringe-level center back profile; Cabrera Sasía edges ahead marginally on overall score, suggesting a slightly more consistent output baseline.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Comparable at FQ 47.13, operating in the same below-baseline band; Torres's profile may differ in league context or role specifics, but the overall production level is nearly identical.
Lowest of the three comparables at FQ 46.79, suggesting Smith represents the floor of this peer group; the gap of just 1.12 FQ points across all three comparables indicates a tightly clustered, interchangeable tier of center backs.
The defenseScore sub-score is null, meaning duels won, interceptions, and clearances cannot be assessed — the single most important dimension for a center back. With only 1.54 tackles per 90 visible, there is no evidence of elite defensive activity, and the gap in data prevents any positive inference.
An FQ Score of 47.91 against a form score of 46.99 places this player in the 'typical performer' band (50–59 scale), below the adequate-starter threshold of 60. A 6.86 average match rating across 24 appearances is consistent with a player who rarely influences outcomes decisively.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →