TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Ardian Ismajli

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Torino
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Sep 30, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#44
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Ardian Ismajli
Ardian Ismajli
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Torino
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Sep 30, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#44
TactiQ Score
74.0
83% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
74.0
Form Score
68.1
Confidence
83%
Role
center_back
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.05
Key Pass
0.20
Tackles
1.54
Rating
6.86
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A fringe-level center back in Serie A with an FQ Score of 47.91, placing them in the bottom half of the scoring scale — typical of a squad player or rotation option rather than a reliable starter. The most distinctive feature of this profile is what's missing: all role-specific sub-scores, including the defensive dimension that defines center back evaluation, are null, leaving the 1,816 minutes played this season without a granular quality breakdown. At 0.80 confidence across 24 matches, the sample is adequate, but the picture it paints is one of below-baseline output.

Why this score

The FQ Score of 47.91 is driven primarily by below-baseline overall performance in the 44–48 range, with no defensive sub-score available to identify any redeeming strength in the core center back dimension. The per-90 data — 1.54 tackles, 0.20 key passes, a 6.86 match rating — reflects a player contributing at a modest, unremarkable level without standout output in any measurable category.

Form Trajectory

Form score (46.99) sits 0.92 points below the FQ Score (47.91), a delta within the ±5 stable range — trajectory is flat rather than deteriorating. There is no meaningful upward momentum, but equally no sign of acute collapse; this player is performing at a consistently modest level.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Leandro Daniel Cabrera Sasía

Closest comparable at FQ 48.49, reflecting a similarly fringe-level center back profile; Cabrera Sasía edges ahead marginally on overall score, suggesting a slightly more consistent output baseline.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
24
Minutes
1816
Assists
1
Key passes
4
Rating
6.86
Tackles
31
Shots on target
4
Successful dribbles
2
Clean sheets
9
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 69.7Form 70.2
Previous
TQ 74.3Form 74.7
Current
TQ 67.6Form 68.1
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.05
Key Passes
0.20
Tackles
1.54
Rating
6.86
Pau Francisco Torres

Comparable at FQ 47.13, operating in the same below-baseline band; Torres's profile may differ in league context or role specifics, but the overall production level is nearly identical.

Compare →
Eric Anders Smith

Lowest of the three comparables at FQ 46.79, suggesting Smith represents the floor of this peer group; the gap of just 1.12 FQ points across all three comparables indicates a tightly clustered, interchangeable tier of center backs.

Compare →
Heavy minute load
1816 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive activity
31 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
9 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output (unquantified)

The defenseScore sub-score is null, meaning duels won, interceptions, and clearances cannot be assessed — the single most important dimension for a center back. With only 1.54 tackles per 90 visible, there is no evidence of elite defensive activity, and the gap in data prevents any positive inference.

Overall production

An FQ Score of 47.91 against a form score of 46.99 places this player in the 'typical performer' band (50–59 scale), below the adequate-starter threshold of 60. A 6.86 average match rating across 24 appearances is consistent with a player who rarely influences outcomes decisively.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →