TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Mario Pašalić

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Atalanta
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Feb 9, 1995 (31)
Jersey Number
#8
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Mario Pašalić
Mario Pašalić
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Atalanta
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Feb 9, 1995 (31)
Jersey Number
#8
TactiQ Score
70.7
88% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
70.7
Form Score
67.1
Confidence
88%
Role
central_midfielder
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.15
Assists
0.25
Key Pass
1.91
Tackles
1.26
Rating
6.98
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A Serie A central midfielder sitting at 55.95 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range, with 28 appearances and 1,684 minutes this season providing a reliable read. The most distinctive output is a 7.0 average match rating paired with 1.98 key passes per 90, suggesting a player who contributes in the final third of possession without dominating any single dimension. No sub-score breakdown is available, which limits how precisely we can locate the ceiling.

Why this score

With all dimensional sub-scores (creation, progression, defense, finishing) returning null, the FQ score of 55.95 is driven entirely by aggregate per-90 output and baseline consistency rather than any standout role-specific metric. The 0.27 assists and 1.98 key passes per 90 are the strongest visible signals, but without a creation sub-score to anchor them, the overall read lands in the mid-50s typical performer band.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 56.45 sits just 0.5 points above the FQ score of 55.95 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward movement; this player is delivering exactly what their season average predicts.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
John McGinn

McGinn's FQ score of 55.25 places him in the same typical performer band, reflecting a similar profile of steady, non-elite central midfield contribution; McGinn tends to offer more direct goal threat, whereas this player's key pass volume suggests a slightly more creative lean.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
31
Minutes
1815
Goals
3
Assists
5
Key passes
38
Rating
6.96
Tackles
25
Shots on target
6
Successful dribbles
7
Clean sheets
8
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 69.4Form 69.3
Previous
TQ 67.7Form 67.5
Current
TQ 67.2Form 67.1
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.15
Assists
0.25
Key Passes
1.91
Tackles
1.26
Rating
6.98
Aleix García Serrano

García Serrano's 56.98 FQ score is the closest numerical match, and both players operate as reliable but unspectacular central midfielders; García Serrano has a stronger reputation for progressive passing, a dimension we cannot directly compare here due to null sub-scores.

Compare →
Ryan Christie

Christie's 57.68 FQ score sits just above this player's 55.95, representing a similar ceiling in the mid-50s range; Christie typically contributes more in transition and wide areas, while this player's 1.34 tackles per 90 suggests a more balanced two-way profile.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
1815 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
25 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
8 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Dimensional transparency

All role-critical sub-scores — creation, progression, defense, finishing — are null. For a central midfielder, creation and progression are the primary value drivers; their absence means we cannot confirm whether the 1.98 key passes per 90 reflects genuine creative output or volume without quality.

Goal contribution

0.16 goals per 90 and 0.27 assists per 90 are below what top-tier central midfielders in Serie A typically produce. Combined, the direct output rate is modest and consistent with a squad-level rather than difference-making role.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →