TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Robert Sánchez

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Chelsea
Position
Goalkeeper
Date of Birth
Nov 18, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#1
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Robert Sánchez
Robert Sánchez
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Chelsea
Position
Goalkeeper
Date of Birth
Nov 18, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#1
TactiQ Score
72.7
94% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
72.7
Form Score
67.3
Confidence
94%
Role
goalkeeper
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.03
Key Pass
0.16
Tackles
0.06
Rating
6.80
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 11, 2026

A Premier League goalkeeper with a TactiQ Score of 83.53 — placing him in the above-average tier, notably better than a typical starter at this level. His most distinctive quality is physical dominance in the box: an 89% duel success rate and consistent aerial and clearance output across 2,861 minutes this season. Core shot-stopping data (saves/90, save percentage, clean sheets) is absent from the evidence packet, which limits a full picture of his shot-stopping quality.

Why this score

The 83.53 TactiQ Score is driven primarily by strong physical duel metrics and high data confidence (0.94), with specialist agents scoring him 68–72 across performance, risk, and context dimensions. The absence of goalkeeper-specific production data — saves, save percentage, goals conceded — prevents a higher ceiling, as the primary output dimension for this role cannot be directly assessed.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 78.42 sits 5.1 points below the TactiQ Score of 83.53, placing this squarely in soft-decline territory. The underlying physical metrics remain stable — 89% duel success rate and consistent clearance output — suggesting the dip is modest rather than a structural deterioration, but it warrants monitoring over the next fixture block.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Martin Dúbravka

Dúbravka (82.65) is the closest match overall, similarly rated as a reliable Premier League-level goalkeeper with strong physical presence; the key difference is Dúbravka has a more established shot-stopping data profile at this level.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

7 metrics surfaced
Appearances
33
Minutes
2861
Assists
1
Key passes
5
Rating
6.80
Tackles
2
Clean sheets
9
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2861 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive outcomes
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 72.0Form 72.1
Previous
TQ 73.2Form 73.3
Current
TQ 67.3Form 67.3
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.03
Key Passes
0.16
Tackles
0.06
Rating
6.80
Paulo Dino Gazzaniga

Gazzaniga (82.22) mirrors the mid-tier top-division profile and physical consistency; he differs in that his role has typically come with more defined save-volume data from regular starting stints.

Compare →
Thibaut Courtois

Courtois (82.12) shares a comparable TactiQ Score band but represents a different profile — elite shot-stopping metrics underpin his score, whereas this player's score leans more heavily on physical duel output given the data gaps.

Compare →
9 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Save load
91 saves suggest a significant shot-stopping workload in current coverage.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Shot-stopping evidence

Saves/90, save percentage, and clean sheet data are entirely absent from the dataset. For a goalkeeper, these are the primary performance indicators — their absence means the most critical dimension of his role cannot be evaluated, and the score reflects this structural gap.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →