Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A center-back sitting at 81.62 on the TactiQ scale — above-average for the position and notably distinguished by an offensive contribution rate (0.71 key passes/90, 0.1 goals/90) that is unusual for the role. Defensively, he is consistent and reliable across 33 matches (2,781 minutes) rather than dominant, with a 60% duel success rate and 2.27 tackles/90 placing him firmly in the dependable-but-not-elite bracket.
The 81.62 TactiQ Score is driven primarily by the combination of steady defensive output — 2.27 tackles/90, 3.85 clearances/90 — and an above-expectation offensive contribution for a center-back, which together push him clear of the 70–77 "good" band. The absence of elite aerial or duel dominance (1.59 aerials won/90, 5.83 duels won/90) is what keeps him from the 85+ tier.
With a form score of 89.59 against a TactiQ Score of 81.62, the gap of +7.97 points signals a clear upward trajectory — his recent performances are running meaningfully ahead of his season baseline. If sustained, this form level would place him in the 85–89 elite band.
Both profile as consistent, physically engaged center-backs with comparable TactiQ scores in the high-70s, though Cabrera Sasía's 77.7 sits slightly below this player's 81.62, suggesting a modest edge in overall output.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Similar TactiQ score (77.58) and role profile as a reliable but non-dominant defensive center-back; Chalobah's profile skews more toward pure defensive metrics with less of the offensive key-pass contribution seen here.
García Martret (77.1) shares the ball-playing center-back archetype and comparable scoring range, but this player's higher TactiQ score of 81.62 reflects a stronger overall output across defensive volume and offensive involvement.
1.59 aerials won/90 is modest for a center-back in Serie A. For a defender whose primary job includes winning second balls and set-piece duels, this represents a meaningful positional gap rather than an incidental one.
5.83 duels won/90 at a 60% success rate is competent but not dominant. Against top-flight attackers, a ceiling of 60% in physical contests limits his ability to single-handedly neutralise direct opponents.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →