Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga center-back sitting at 48.04 on the FQ scale — below the 50-59 "typical performer" band and firmly in fringe territory. The most distinctive feature of this evaluation is not a specific weakness but an absence: all role-critical sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) are null, meaning the score is built on thin positional signal rather than granular defensive data. With 2,061 minutes across 24 matches, sample size is not the issue — the data gaps reflect a measurement limitation, not low minutes.
The FQ score of 48.04 is driven primarily by below-baseline overall output with no sub-score able to pull it upward — the defenseScore, which is the primary evaluation dimension for a center-back, is null. Without it, the score defaults to a low baseline, and the per-90 data (1.35 tackles, 0.22 key passes, 7.07 rating) does not provide enough signal to elevate it.
Form score of 49.72 sits just 1.68 points above the FQ score of 48.04 — within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend; performance is flat and consistent with the overall rating.
Closest comparable at 48.49 FQ, operating in the same fringe-to-typical band; both sit below the 50-59 baseline, though Cabrera Sasía edges this player by 0.45 points.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Comparable FQ score of 47.13 places Torres in the same evaluation tier; the marginal gap of under 1 point suggests near-identical overall output levels, though positional context may differ.
At 46.79, Smith is the lowest of the three comparables and sits 1.25 points below this player — a negligible difference that underlines how tightly clustered this group is at the lower end of the adequate-starter threshold.
The defenseScore is null despite 2,061 minutes played — the single most important dimension for a center-back cannot be assessed. Tackles at 1.35 per 90 are the only defensive proxy available, and that figure alone is insufficient to evaluate duels won, aerial success, or interception volume.
Key passes of 0.22 per 90 indicate minimal creative contribution from deep, which is within acceptable range for a center-back but cannot be contextualised against a progression sub-score that is also null.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →