TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Federico Baschirotto

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Cremonese
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Sep 20, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#6
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Federico Baschirotto
Federico Baschirotto
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Cremonese
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Sep 20, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#6
TactiQ Score
73.0
93% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
73.0
Form Score
68.0
Confidence
93%
Role
center_back
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.07
Assists
—
Key Pass
0.07
Tackles
0.99
Rating
6.79
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A fringe-level Serie A center back sitting at 47.6 on the FQ scale — below the platform median and well short of the baseline expected for a starting defender in a top-five league. Across 28 matches (2,520 minutes), the per-90 output is thin: 1.0 tackle, 0.07 key passes, and an average match rating of 6.8, with no measurable contribution in creation or progression dimensions. High data confidence (0.90) means this reading is reliable, not a sample-size artifact.

Why this score

The FQ score of 47.6 is driven primarily by below-baseline defensive and overall output for the center back role — all granular sub-scores (defense, progression, creation) are null, meaning no dimension is pulling the composite upward. The 6.8 average rating and 1.0 tackle per 90 are the only positive signals, and neither clears the bar for a starting Serie A center back.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 46.74 sits just 0.86 points below the FQ score of 47.6 — a delta of -0.9, well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum; this player is performing consistently at a below-median level.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Pau Francisco Torres

Torres scores 47.13 — nearly identical to this player's 47.6 — reflecting a similar profile of below-median center back output; the key difference is any role or league context variation between the two.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
29
Minutes
2541
Goals
2
Key passes
2
Rating
6.79
Tackles
28
Shots on target
5
Successful dribbles
1
Clean sheets
8
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 67.3Form 68.0
Previous
TQ 73.2Form 73.7
Current
TQ 67.2Form 68.0
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.07
Assists
—
Key Passes
0.07
Tackles
0.99
Rating
6.79
Eric Anders Smith

Smith's 46.79 FQ score places him in the same fringe-starter band, making him a close statistical peer; differences in per-90 defensive actions would be the primary distinguishing factor.

Compare →
Leandro Daniel Cabrera Sasía

Cabrera Sasía leads this comparable group at 48.49, marginally above this player's 47.6, suggesting a slightly stronger baseline output while remaining in the same below-median tier.

Compare →
Heavy minute load
2541 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive activity
28 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
8 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

1.0 tackle per 90 is the sole recorded defensive action, and the defense sub-score is null — meaning no interception, duel, or aerial data is available to confirm role-specific contribution. For a center back, this is a meaningful gap.

Progression & creation

Key passes sit at just 0.07 per 90 and the progression sub-score is null. Modern center backs are expected to drive play forward; there is no evidence of that here.

Goal threat

0.07 goals per 90 from a center back is not a concern in isolation, but combined with the absence of any other positive output, it underlines the limited overall contribution.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →