Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A fringe-level Serie A center back sitting at 47.6 on the FQ scale — below the platform median and well short of the baseline expected for a starting defender in a top-five league. Across 28 matches (2,520 minutes), the per-90 output is thin: 1.0 tackle, 0.07 key passes, and an average match rating of 6.8, with no measurable contribution in creation or progression dimensions. High data confidence (0.90) means this reading is reliable, not a sample-size artifact.
The FQ score of 47.6 is driven primarily by below-baseline defensive and overall output for the center back role — all granular sub-scores (defense, progression, creation) are null, meaning no dimension is pulling the composite upward. The 6.8 average rating and 1.0 tackle per 90 are the only positive signals, and neither clears the bar for a starting Serie A center back.
Form score of 46.74 sits just 0.86 points below the FQ score of 47.6 — a delta of -0.9, well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum; this player is performing consistently at a below-median level.
Torres scores 47.13 — nearly identical to this player's 47.6 — reflecting a similar profile of below-median center back output; the key difference is any role or league context variation between the two.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Smith's 46.79 FQ score places him in the same fringe-starter band, making him a close statistical peer; differences in per-90 defensive actions would be the primary distinguishing factor.
Cabrera Sasía leads this comparable group at 48.49, marginally above this player's 47.6, suggesting a slightly stronger baseline output while remaining in the same below-median tier.
1.0 tackle per 90 is the sole recorded defensive action, and the defense sub-score is null — meaning no interception, duel, or aerial data is available to confirm role-specific contribution. For a center back, this is a meaningful gap.
Key passes sit at just 0.07 per 90 and the progression sub-score is null. Modern center backs are expected to drive play forward; there is no evidence of that here.
0.07 goals per 90 from a center back is not a concern in isolation, but combined with the absence of any other positive output, it underlines the limited overall contribution.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →