TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Florian Thauvin

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Lens
Position
Right Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
Jan 26, 1993 (33)
Jersey Number
#10
League
Ligue 1
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Florian Thauvin
Florian Thauvin
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Lens
Position
Right Wing
Also: Winger
Date of Birth
Jan 26, 1993 (33)
Jersey Number
#10
TactiQ Score
69.3
94% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
69.3
Form Score
71.0
Confidence
94%
Role
winger
League
Ligue 1
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.38
Assists
0.19
Key Pass
2.86
Tackles
1.02
Rating
7.31
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 9, 2026

A consistent Ligue 1 winger sitting at 69.12 on the TQ scale — adequate starter territory, meaningfully above the positional baseline but short of the 70-77 "good" band. Across 30 matches and 2,306 minutes this season, the most distinctive output is a key pass rate of 2.81 per 90, pointing to sustained involvement in build-up rather than pure goal threat. The overall picture is a reliable contributor without a standout elite dimension.

Why this score

With all sub-scores null, the TQ Score of 69.12 is driven by aggregate production metrics: 0.39 goals per 90 and 0.20 assists per 90 represent solid but not elite attacking returns for a winger, and the absence of a breakout dimension in any single area keeps the score anchored in the mid-60s rather than pushing toward 75+.

Form Trajectory

Form is stable-to-slightly-improving: the form score of 72.17 sits 3.05 points above the TQ Score of 69.12, which is within the ±5 stable band but nudging upward — no meaningful concern, and no strong acceleration signal either.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Jarrod Bowen

Bowen's TQ score of 68.69 is nearly identical, reflecting a similar profile of consistent wide-attacking output in the adequate-starter tier; the key difference is Bowen's Premier League context, which implies higher baseline competition.

Compare →
Nicolas Pépé
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
31
Minutes
2392
Goals
10
Assists
5
Key passes
76
Rating
7.31
Tackles
27
Shots on target
26
Successful dribbles
46
Clean sheets
10
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 66.2Form 66.1
Previous
TQ 68.8Form 69.3
Current
TQ 70.5Form 71.0
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.38
Assists
0.19
Key Passes
2.86
Tackles
1.02
Rating
7.31

Pépé's 66.64 TQ score reflects a comparable production level from a wide position, though Pépé's career arc shows greater volatility in output — this player's form signal is currently more stable.

Compare →
Matìas Soulè Malvano

Soulè Malvano scores 65.99, slightly below this player, with a similar role profile; the gap of roughly 3 TQ points likely reflects this player's higher per-90 key pass volume giving a marginal creation edge.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2392 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Strong current rating
Live rating sits at 7.31 in the current season snapshot.
Direct output
15 combined goals and assists are showing in live coverage.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Goal threat

0.39 goals per 90 is a functional return for a Ligue 1 winger but falls short of the output typically associated with top-end wide attackers; without a finishing sub-score to confirm, conversion efficiency remains an open question.

Defensive contribution

0.98 tackles per 90 is modest for a winger in a league where pressing intensity is expected; this may limit suitability in high-press systems that demand two-way work from wide players.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →