TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Fabian Schär

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Newcastle United
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Dec 20, 1991 (34)
Jersey Number
#5
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Fabian Schär
Fabian Schär
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Newcastle United
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Dec 20, 1991 (34)
Jersey Number
#5
TactiQ Score
72.7
67% confidenceCalibrating
TactiQ Score v2
72.7
Calibrating
Form Score
69.4
Confidence
67%
Role
center_back
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
—
Key Pass
0.33
Tackles
1.16
Rating
6.98
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A fringe-level center-back in the Premier League sitting at an FQ Score of 48.07 — below the typical starter threshold and in the bottom half of all scored players. Across 16 matches and 1,090 minutes this season, the available per-90 data shows 1.16 tackles and a 6.98 average rating, but the absence of all role-critical sub-scores (defense, physical duels, progression) means the full picture cannot be drawn. This is a player whose data profile raises more questions than it answers.

Why this score

The FQ Score of 48.07 is driven primarily by below-baseline raw performance metrics — the performance agent scores this at 44 — compounded by the complete absence of defensive sub-scores, which are the core evaluation dimensions for a center-back. Without visibility into duels won, aerial dominance, or interceptions, the score cannot be lifted by positional strengths that may exist but cannot be verified.

Form Trajectory

Form is essentially stable — the form score of 46.51 sits just 1.56 points below the FQ Score of 48.07, within the ±5 stable range. However, the risk agent flags a slight declining direction, and with score confidence at 0.64 — just at the threshold of reliable evidence — this stability reading carries moderate uncertainty.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Leandro Daniel Cabrera Sasía

The closest comparable at an FQ Score of 48.49, reflecting a similarly fringe-level profile; the marginal gap of 0.42 FQ points suggests near-identical overall standing, though positional style differences may exist.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

7 metrics surfaced
Appearances
16
Minutes
1090
Key passes
4
Rating
6.98
Tackles
14
Shots on target
4
Clean sheets
4
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Season sample available
16 appearances are currently surfaced by the live data layer.
Strengths
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 72.6Form 73.1
Previous
TQ 69.2Form 69.5
Current
TQ 69.1Form 69.4
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
—
Key Passes
0.33
Tackles
1.16
Rating
6.98
Pau Francisco Torres

Comparable at 47.13 FQ Score, sitting just below this player's current mark; both occupy the below-50 fringe band, though Torres's score gap suggests marginally less output.

Compare →
Eric Anders Smith

At 46.79 FQ Score, Smith represents the lower bound of this comparable cluster; all three comparables are tightly grouped within a 1.7-point range, underlining how undifferentiated this performance tier is.

Compare →
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output visibility

All defensive sub-scores (defense, physicalDuel, progression) are null. For a center-back, this is not a peripheral gap — it means the player's primary job cannot be assessed. The 1.16 tackles per 90 is the only defensive signal available, and it sits at a modest level for a Premier League CB.

Key pass contribution

0.33 key passes per 90 is a low output for a center-back expected to contribute to build-up play, suggesting limited involvement in progressive or creative phases of play.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →