Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A fringe-level center-back in the Premier League sitting at an FQ Score of 48.07 — below the typical starter threshold and in the bottom half of all scored players. Across 16 matches and 1,090 minutes this season, the available per-90 data shows 1.16 tackles and a 6.98 average rating, but the absence of all role-critical sub-scores (defense, physical duels, progression) means the full picture cannot be drawn. This is a player whose data profile raises more questions than it answers.
The FQ Score of 48.07 is driven primarily by below-baseline raw performance metrics — the performance agent scores this at 44 — compounded by the complete absence of defensive sub-scores, which are the core evaluation dimensions for a center-back. Without visibility into duels won, aerial dominance, or interceptions, the score cannot be lifted by positional strengths that may exist but cannot be verified.
Form is essentially stable — the form score of 46.51 sits just 1.56 points below the FQ Score of 48.07, within the ±5 stable range. However, the risk agent flags a slight declining direction, and with score confidence at 0.64 — just at the threshold of reliable evidence — this stability reading carries moderate uncertainty.
The closest comparable at an FQ Score of 48.49, reflecting a similarly fringe-level profile; the marginal gap of 0.42 FQ points suggests near-identical overall standing, though positional style differences may exist.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Comparable at 47.13 FQ Score, sitting just below this player's current mark; both occupy the below-50 fringe band, though Torres's score gap suggests marginally less output.
At 46.79 FQ Score, Smith represents the lower bound of this comparable cluster; all three comparables are tightly grouped within a 1.7-point range, underlining how undifferentiated this performance tier is.
All defensive sub-scores (defense, physicalDuel, progression) are null. For a center-back, this is not a peripheral gap — it means the player's primary job cannot be assessed. The 1.16 tackles per 90 is the only defensive signal available, and it sits at a modest level for a Premier League CB.
0.33 key passes per 90 is a low output for a center-back expected to contribute to build-up play, suggesting limited involvement in progressive or creative phases of play.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →